Flow over cube arrays of different packing densities

By H. Cheng, P. Hayden, A. Robins, I. Castro. 2007

187 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Computational Mechanics, Environmental Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/73b78e45476a717207f3cc259345707ae3975f6e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aerospace Engineering

1. A. Martilli
2. J. Santiago
3. Stefano Leonardi
4. O. Coceal
5. I. Castro
6. S. Belcher
7. M. Kanda
8. Xiang I. A. Yang

In Computational Mechanics

1. Stefano Leonardi
2. I. Castro
3. A. Martilli
4. J. Santiago
5. O. Coceal
6. Xiang I. A. Yang
7. Aya Hagishima
8. Sho Meno

In Environmental Engineering

1. Stefano Leonardi
2. I. Castro
3. A. Martilli
4. J. Santiago
5. O. Coceal
6. Aya Hagishima
7. S. Belcher
8. Sho Meno

Citations in the corpus

• Exponential roughness layer and analytical model for turbulent boundary layer flow over rectangular-prism roughness elements (2016, methodology): “…with relatively early experiments, for example Hall et al. (1996) (which Macdonald (2000) and Coceal & Belcher (2004) have used for model calibration), the hydrodynamic roughness lengths reported by more recent experiments and simulations (Cheng et al. 2007; Jiang et al. 2008) tend to be smaller.”
• A New Aerodynamic Parametrization for Real Urban Surfaces (2013, methodology): “The data used for the comparison were from wind-tunnel experiments for aligned and staggered arrays of cubes (Cheng et al. 2007), wind-tunnel experiments for square and staggered arrays of buildings both with homogeneous height and variable height (Hagishima et al. 2009), wind-tunnel experiments…”
• Channel flow over large cube roughness: a direct numerical simulation study (2010, methodology): “Figure 5 also includes experimental data obtained by Cheng et al. (2007) in a boundary layer. The agreement is satisfyingly close to the present results, especially given the well-known uncertainties in the fitting procedures required to obtain both quantities – particularly in boundary layers for w”
• Variation of the Sectional Drag Coefficient of a Group of Buildings with Packing Density (2008, methodology): “On the other hand wind-tunnel measurements of the drag were taken by Cheng et al. (2007 ) f orλf = 0.25 and λf = 0.0625.”
• Aerodynamic Parameters of Regular Arrays of Rectangular Blocks with Various Geometries (2009, methodology): “For example, Cheng et al. (2007) showed that the surface shear stress directly measured using pressure-tapping blocks is larger than that deduced from the peak of the Reynolds stress using a cross hot-wire anemometer.”
• A Dynamic Urban Canopy Parameterization for Mesoscale Models Based on Computational Fluid Dynamics Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes Microscale Simulations (2010, methodology): “Note that RANS results for the case of λ f = 0.25 were validated against DNS data and compared with the experimental results of Cheng et al. (2007 ) ( seeSantiago et al. 2008).”