Evidence of NAFLD progression from steatosis to fibrosing-steatohepatitis using paired biopsies: implications for prognosis and clinical management.

By S. McPherson, T. Hardy, E. Henderson, A. Burt, C. Day, Q. Anstee. Journal of Hepatology, 2015

1,003 citations recorded by the source corpus.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS There remains uncertainty about the natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The spectrum of NAFLD includes non-alcoholic fatty liver (NAFL; steatosis without hepatocellular injury) and steatohepatitis (NASH; steatosis with hepatocyte ballooning degeneration±fibrosis). Our aim was to assess the histological severity of NAFLD in a cohort with serial biopsy data, and determine factors predicting progression. METHODS Patients with two liver biopsies more than a year apart were identified. Clinical and laboratory data were collected from the time of liver biopsy. RESULTS 108 patients had serial biopsies (median interval 6.6years, range 1.3-22.6). 81 (75%) patients had NASH and 27 had NAFL. Overall, 45 (42%) patients had fibrosis progression, 43 (40%) had no change in fibrosis, while 20 (18%) had fibrosis regression. Importantly, no significant difference in the proportion exhibiting fibrosis progression was found between those with NAFL or NASH at index biopsy (37% vs. 43%, p=0.65). Progression to NASH was seen in 44% of patients with baseline NAFL. Of 10 patients with NAFL who had fibrosis progression, 3 progressed by 1 stage, 5 by 2 stages and 2 by 3 stages; all had NASH on follow-up biopsy. Of concern, 6 of 27 (22%) patients with baseline NAFL, reached stage 3 fibrosis at follow-up biopsy. Among the patients with NAFL, 80% of those having fibrosis progression were diabetic at the follow-up liver biopsy compared with 25% of non-progressors (p=0.005). CONCLUSIONS Contrary to current dogma, this study suggests that steatosis can progress to NASH and clinically significant fibrosis.

Subfields: Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Epidemiology, Hepatology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3f99519a4a9a4261e3f8be4794053c5b289c3a3e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

  1. G. Targher
  2. Z. Younossi
  3. A. Lonardo
  4. Asociacion Latinoamericana para el Estudio del Higado
  5. Fabio Nascimbeni
  6. A. Mantovani
  7. Megan H. Bair-Merritt
  8. Christopher D. Byrne

In Epidemiology

  1. Z. Younossi
  2. G. Targher
  3. A. Lonardo
  4. Asociacion Latinoamericana para el Estudio del Higado
  5. Fabio Nascimbeni
  6. A. Mantovani
  7. P. Tveden‐Nyborg
  8. M. Kudo

In Hepatology

  1. Z. Younossi
  2. A. Lonardo
  3. Asociacion Latinoamericana para el Estudio del Higado
  4. M. Kudo
  5. A. Cheng
  6. G. Targher

Citations in the corpus