The stress–elongation relation for an adhesive layer loaded in peel using equilibrium of energetic forces
By T. Andersson, U. Stigh. 2004
272 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Materials Chemistry, Mechanics of Materials
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7378c649aced5e809b8bcae33c1c951c249737ee
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
In Materials Chemistry
In Mechanics of Materials
Citations in the corpus
- Shear behaviour of adhesive layers (2007, methodology): “In this way it complements examinations by Andersson and Stigh (2004) and Andersson and Biel (submitted for publication) where the properties in peel are determined.”
- Using a cohesive damage model to predict the tensile behaviour of CFRP single-strap repairs (2008, methodology): “These types of laws accurately reproduce the behaviour of thin adhesive layers in mode I (Andersson and Stigh, 2004) and mode II (Leffler et al., 2007).”
- Pure mode II fracture characterization of composite bonded joints (2009, methodology): “These types of laws accurately reproduced the behaviour of thin ductile adhesive layers in mode I (Andersson and Stigh, 2004) and mode II (Leffler et al., 2007).”
- The influence of adhesive constitutive parameters in cohesive zone finite element models of adhesively bonded joints (2009, background): “Cohesive zone models require a constitutive law for the adhesive layer; considerable research has focused on experimentally determining the correct law (Olsson and Stigh, 1989; Sørensen, 2002; Alfredsson, 2003; Andersson and Stigh, 2004; Andersson and Biel, 2006; Sørensen and Kirkegaard, 2006; Leffl”
- On experimental methods to investigate the effect of layer thickness on the fracture behavior of adhesively bonded joints (2011, methodology): “The basic analysis employed in the evaluation schemes of all of these methods, with the exception of the method in [14], is”
- Crack equivalent concept applied to the fracture characterization of bonded joints under pure mode I loading (2008, methodology): “The majority of joints fracture characterization under pure mode I is performed using the DCB specimen [3, 8-10].”
- Modelling the tensile fracture behaviour of CFRP scarf repairs (2009, methodology): “On this issue, Andersson and Stigh [25] used an inverse method to obtain the cohesive properties of a thin adhesive layer in pure mode I using the DCB test.”