Is aggregate demand wage-led or profit-led? National and global effects

178 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Testing the Bhaduri–Marglin model with OECD panel data (2014, unknown): “…is largely buttressed by studies focusing on countries or regions other than (or in addition to) the above-mentioned seven, such as Onaran and Stockhammer (2005); Stockhammer, Onaran, and Ederer (2009); Stockhammer and Stehrer (2011); Onaran and Galanis (2012); Hartwig (2013) and Kinsella (2013).”
Rising inequality as a cause of the present crisis (2015, methodology): “This model has inspired a series of empirical studies, including Bowles and Boyer (1995), Stockhammer and Onaran (2004), Naastepad and Storm (2006/7), Hein and Vogel (2008), Stockhammer and Stehrer (2011) and Onaran and Galanis (2012).”
Crisis and recovery in the German economy: The real lessons (2015, unknown): “The average RULC elasticity of demand for German exports (in Table 3) takes a value of −0.16, which is close to the findings of Onaran and Galanis (2012) and Storm and Naastepad (2012) – the only two studies directly estimating the RULC elasticity of German exports.”
Debt-driven growth? Wealth, distribution and demand in OECD countries (2016, background): “Bhaduri and Marglin (1990) presented a unifying framework, which allows for both wage-led and profit-led regimes that has become a widely used tool within post-Keynesian economics and has inspired a rich empirical literature (Bowles and Boyer 1995; Stockhammer and Onaran 2004; Naastepad and Storm 20”