Using second-person neuroscience to elucidate the mechanisms of social interaction

By Elizabeth Redcay, Leonhard Schilbach. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2019

630 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Testing theory of mind in large language models and humans (2024, background): “An important direction for future research will be to examine the impact of these non-human decision behaviours on second-person, Article https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-01882-z real-time human–machine interactions 54,55 .”
Contextual expectations in the real-world modulate low-frequency neural oscillations (2025, unknown): “Indeed, past research indicates differences between neural processes in realistic environments and tasks, and neural processes in the laboratory (Aghajan et al., 2015; David et al., 2004; Hampton et al., 2004; Hölle & Bleichner, 2023; Maimon et al., 2010; Redcay & Schilbach, 2019).”
Neural Mechanisms of Bidirectional Visuo‐Linguistic Transformation in Interactive Communication (2026, unknown): “To investigate this possibility in a naturalistic communicative setting, we used a hyperscanning fMRI paradigm (Jiang et al. 2012; Redcay and Schilbach 2019) that allowed two participants to alternate between describing facial features and reconstructing mental images of faces during real-time…”