More Than Weighting Cognitive Importance: A Dual‐Process Model of Issue Framing Effects

By Rune Slothuus. 2008

267 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Political Science and International Relations, Philosophy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7331ad7b50b67cb53cacfcc1cee51c8bc8ad8ff6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Political Science and International Relations

In Philosophy

Citations in the corpus

Investigating Frame Strength: The Case of Episodic and Thematic Frames (2011, background): “…position or argument about an issue because the frame also “spell[s] out the essence of the problem,” gives meaning to the issue, and suggests how the issue should be thought about and understood (Nelson & Kinder, 1996, p. 1057; see also Sniderman & Theriault, 2004, p. 136; Slothuus, 2008, p. 3).”
Identification and Sensitivity Analysis for Multiple Causal Mechanisms: Revisiting Evidence from Framing Experiments (2013, methodology): “For example, in framing experiments, such as those by Druckman and Nelson (2003) and Slothuus (2008), Mi ðtÞ represents the effect of issue frames on opinions that goes through changes in the perceived importance of the issue induced by the framing effect, whereas Wi ðtÞ equals the portion of the…”
Beyond Cognitive Framing Processes: Anger Mediates the Effects of Responsibility Framing on the Preference for Punitive Measures (2015, background): “Accordingly, it has been proposed that the psychological mechanisms of framing effects must be further investigated (Lecheler, Schuck, & de Vreese, 2013; Slothuus, 2008).”
Dealing with feelings: Positive and negative discrete emotions as mediators of news framing effects (2012, methodology): “This integrates emotional response with existing models of the psychology of framing effects (e.g., Nelson et al., 1997; Price et al., 1997; Slothuus, 2008), and suggests a serial mediation of news framing on opinions and attitudes via cognitive and affective processing.”
Getting real: the duration of framing effects (2011, background): “Scholars have recently turned to a third complementary explanation, namely that framing also functions by adding new beliefs to an individual’s belief content (see Lecheler & de Vreese, 2009; Shah, Kwak, Schmierbach, & Zubric, 2004; Slothuus, 2008).”
The Mediating Role of Emotions (2015, background): “, Nelson, Oxley, & Clawson, 1997), and belief content changes (Slothuus, 2008; for an overview, see Chong & Druckman, 2007).”