Positioning and Presenting Design Science Research for Maximum Impact
By Shirley Gregor, Alan R. Hevner. MIS Q., 2013
2,908 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7327f9d57a154ad5021ecfba7b3eff60e2608682
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Information Systems
- Stefan Seidel
- Leona Chandra Kruse
- Jörg Henseler
- Nigel P. Melville
- Rajiv Kohli
- Ogan Yigitbasioglu
- Paul Johannesson
- Erik Perjons
In Sociology and Political Science
- Rajiv Kohli
- Nigel P. Melville
- Stefan Seidel
- Leona Chandra Kruse
- Ogan Yigitbasioglu
- Paul Johannesson
- Erik Perjons
- Jodie Moll
Citations in the corpus
- The role of internet-related technologies in shaping the work of accountants: New directions for accounting research (2019, methodology): “This work would require proof of concepts using a design science approach to develop and validate new artefacts serving financial accounting tasks (Gregor and Hevner, 2013).”
- Toward Meaningful Engagement: A Framework for Design and Research of Gamified Information Systems (2017, background): “Particularly, the design and evaluation of IT artifacts, a key paradigm for IS research, is receiving more attention as we better understand ways to conduct and publish such research (Goes 2014; Gregor and Hevner 2013; Hevner et al. 2004).”
- Digital innovation: A review and synthesis (2019, background): “Design science “ has staked its rightful ground as an important and legitimate Information Systems (IS) research paradigm ” (Gregor & Hevner, 2013, p. 337).”
- Predicting process behaviour using deep learning (2016, background): “tives into process execution, monitoring, and analysis. Extending existing solutions to novel problems ("exaptation") is a recognized and valid way to make a contribution in design science (Gregor and Hevner, 2013), which is the research approach we apply here. We not only provide a new ap”
- Research Perspectives: The Anatomy of a Design Principle (2020, methodology): “…1993; von Wright, 1963), design rules (e.g., Plsek, Bibby, & Whitby, 2007), analysis patterns (Fowler, 1996), computing principles (Denning & Martell, 2015), design propositions (van Aken, Chandrasekaran, & Halman, 2016), and design principles (Gregor & Hevner, 2013; Sein et al., 2011).”
- A Big Data Analytics Method for Tourist Behaviour Analysis (2017, positive): “The adopted research methodology is modelled on the framework proposed by Hevner et al. [25], which conforms to seven guidelines covering three broad project phases (described in Table 2): identifying business problems and artefact types; artefact creation and evaluation and, finally, research contr”
- Digital Nudging (2016, background): “Second, from a design-oriented perspective, knowledge on digital nudging will advance our ability to build information systems that serve certain purposes, so this knowledge contributes to design science research (Gregor and Hevner 2013; Hevner et al. 2004; Peffers et al. 2008).”
- HTMT2-an improved criterion for assessing discriminant validity in structural equation modeling (2021, background): “The structure of this paper largely follows the suggestion by Gregor and Hevner (2013).”
- An Introduction to Design Science (2014, methodology): “Similarly to the work by Gregor and Hevner (2013), Gero (1990) uses this framework to distinguish between routine design, innovative design, and creative design.”