Fair Income Tax
By Marc Fleurbaey, François Maniquet. 2006
192 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Gender Studies
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/73209f91e21c077c580a62b605e0f358d65caf0e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- John E. Roemer
- Alexander W. Cappelen
- Bertil Tungodden
- Erik Ø. Sørensen
- S. Chabé-Ferret
- J. Lind
- Alain Trannoy
- Ingvild Almås
In Gender Studies
- Erik Ø. Sørensen
- S. Chabé-Ferret
- John E. Roemer
- J. Lind
- Alain Trannoy
- Bertil Tungodden
- Alexander W. Cappelen
- Ingvild Almås
Citations in the corpus
- Equality of Opportunity: Theory and Measurement (2016, background): “As noted, this approach provides a theory of optimal taxation that does not rely on cardinalization of the utility function (Fleurbaey and Maniquet 2006; Fleurbaey and Maniquet 2011a, chapter 11).”
- How much green for the buck? Estimating additional and windfall effects of French agro-environmental schemes by DID-matching (2010, background): “Formalizing this trade-off between ethics and efficiency is a nice avenue for further research, for example using insights from fair taxation [12].”
- Measuring Unfair (in) Equality (2008, methodology): “An interesting alternative approachwould be to apply the theoretical framework of Fleurbaey and Maniquet (2006), who focus more directly on holding people responsible for their preferences.”
- The Promise of Positive Optimal Taxation (2014, unknown): “Fleurbaey and Maniquet (2006) allow for considerations of fairness and responsibility with respect to preference heterogeneity.”