Motivational interviewing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

By S. Rubak, A. Sandbaek, T. Lauritzen, B. Christensen. The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2005

2,019 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/72eda3698b4a86b8bb7c204407a16cf1f2692186

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Motivational interviewing in medical care settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. (2013, background): “Comparison with other findings To date, four general meta-analyses of MI across problem types and settings have been published [15,17–19].”
European Guidelines on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (Version 2012) (2012, unknown): “Behavioural interventions such as ‘motivational interviewing’(201) increase motivation and self-efficacy.(196) Previous negative, unsuccessful attempts to change behaviour often result in a lower self-efficacy for future change and often lead to another failure.”
Motivation and Autonomy in Counseling, Psychotherapy, and Behavior Change: A Look at Theory and Practice 1ψ7 (2011, unknown): “It is important, however, to note that establishing a simplex pattern does not necessarily have any temporal or age-related implications; for example, it need not imply a stage theory or a developmental sequence (Ryan & Connell, 1989; Sutton, 2001). In this case, it also does not imply that behavior”
Medication Adherence Measures: An Overview (2015, background): “indicated that by its ability to combine identification of the causes behind nonadherence and subsequent intervention, motivational interviewing outperforms the traditional advice giving [43].”
Medication adherence: WHO cares? (2011, background): “A meta-analysis of 72 randomized controlled trials showed significant benefit for motivational interviewing in achieving cholesterol and BP control, with psychologists and physicians able to achieve an effect in 80% of the studies.(91) A randomized trial conducted in 190 African Americans with hyper”
2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. (2016, background): “Behavioural interventions such as ‘motivational interviewing’ increase motivation and selfefficacy.(231)”
Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: the European perspective (2005, unknown): “Behavioural interventions such as “motivational interviewing” 1475 increase motivation and self-efficacy.(233) 1476 Previous unsuccessful attempts often affect self-efficacy for future change.”