Systematic conservation planning

By C. Margules, R. Pressey. Nature, 2000

5,659 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/72e99abe3aff7dda2a0e08c6db8aa64aa2fe8dc9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Conservation

Citations in the corpus

How to make more out of community data? A conceptual framework and its implementation as models and software. (2017, background): “Such regions can then be considered as management units, or be used in reserve selection (Margules & Pressey 2000).”
Hotspots, complementarity or representativeness? designing optimal small-scale reserves for biodiversity conservation (2004, background): “All these factors, ecological or not, should be taken into consideration in order to ensure the long-term conservation of biodiversity and maintenance of natural ecosystem processes (Margules and Pressey, 2000; Purvis and Hector, 2000).”
Global Conservation of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (2007, background): “Conservation planning theory revolves around a framework of vulnerability, which measures the risk to species in an area, and irreplaceability, which measures the extent to which spatial substitutes exist for securing the biodiversity present in an area (Margules and Pressey 2000).”
Applications and limitations of museum data for conservation and ecology, with particular attention to species distribution models (2010, background): “Conservation ecologists often use species richness to assess how important it is to protect an area because species richness is relatively easy to measure, although other criteria may be more informative (Kershaw et al., 1995; Margules and Pressey, 2000; Wilson et al., 2007).”
Using generalized dissimilarity modelling to analyse and predict patterns of beta diversity in regional biodiversity assessment (2007, background): “Conservation assessment and planning require information on the spatial distribution of biodiversity, often across very large regions (Margules & Pressey, 2000).”
Where to put things? Spatial land management to sustain biodiversity and economic returns (2008, background): “The primary response of conservation biologists to the rapid loss of natural habitat has been to push for a system of protected areas that adequately protect biodiversity (e.g., Margules and Pressey, 2000; Margules and Sarkar, 2006; Sarkar et al., 2006).”
Challenging Wallacean and Linnean shortfalls: knowledge gradients and conservation planning in a biodiversity hotspot (2006, background): “…see also Andelman et al ., 1999) to choose a subset of cells (the reserve network) that represent all anuran species at least once, based on the complementarity concept (Church et al ., 1996; Pressey et al ., 1997; Margules & Pressey, 2000; see also Cabeza & Moilanen, 2001; Williams et al ., 2004).”
Making protected area networks effective for marine top predators (2011, methodology): “Therefore, monitoring should be an integral and indispensable part of any MPA network management plan (Margules & Pressey 2000).”
Habitat fragmentation causes immediate and time-delayed biodiversity loss at different trophic levels (2010, background): “Germany: In Germany, in the vicinity of the city of Göttingen in Lower Saxony, 31 calcareous grassland patches were surveyed (Krauss et al. 2003; 2004).”
Biological Invasions in Conservation Planning: A Global Systematic Review (2018, positive): “To achieve conservation goals, strategies for designing networks of protected areas are needed and should be based on the principles of biodiversity representativeness and persistence, the latter referring to the long-term survival of protected biodiversity by maintaining ecological functions and vi”
Dynamics of Land-Use and Land-Cover Change in Tropical Regions (2003, background): “Fine resolution, spatially explicit data on landscape fragmentation were required to understand the impact of land-use/cover changes on biodiversity (16, 17).”
The conservation value of farmland ponds: Predicting water beetle assemblages using vascular plants as a surrogate group (2010, methodology): “…planning more efficient has led to an increasing interest in the identification of surrogate taxa as potential biodiversity indicators (e.g. Margules and Pressey, 2000; Sætersdal et al., 2003) using cross-taxon congruence analysis (e.g. Prendergast et al., 1993; Howard et al., 1998; Su et…”
Testing the Value of Six Taxonomic Groups as Biodiversity Indicators at a Local Scale (2004, background): “Complementarity (Vane-Wright et al. 1991) is a key principle in conservation planning (Pressey et al. 1993; Margules & Pressey 2000).”