The Purpose in Life Scale: Psychometric Properties for Social Drinkers and Drinkers in Alcohol Treatment
By A. Marsh, Leigh M. Smith, J. Piek, B. Saunders. 2003
98 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Health, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/72da0b40b0f86605b3f23364b0833fda4aaf78a8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
In Health
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- A Confirmatory Factor-Analytic Evaluation of the Purpose in Life Test: Preliminary Psychometric Support for a Replicable Two-Factor Model (2010, methodology): “AGFI = 1.00, NFI = 1.00, TLI = 1.01, CFI = 1.00, and RMSEA = 0.00 with a 90% confidence interval ranging from 0.00 to 0.06), this specific clustering of items is consistent with the previously noted research of Walters and Klein (1980), Dufton and Perlman (1986), Molcar and Stuempfig (1988), Waisber”
- On the Measurement of Meaning: Logotherapy's Empirical Contributions to Humanistic Psychology (2008, background): “Moreover, the relationship between lack of meaning in life and substance use and addiction is well documented ( Crumbaugh, 1971 ; Marsh, Smith, Piek, & Saunders, 2003 ; Nicholson et al, 1994 ).”
- The Purpose in Life Test-Short Form: Development and Psychometric Support (2011, background): “The question was posed as to whether the PIL is one-dimensional, or whether there are viable subscales (Marsh et al. 2003; Reker 2000; Schulenberg and Melton 2010; Shek 1992).”