A Confirmatory Factor-Analytic Evaluation of the Purpose in Life Test: Preliminary Psychometric Support for a Replicable Two-Factor Model

By Stefan E. Schulenberg, Amanda M. A. Melton. 2010

119 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/70cb6707dc74dd935f9280810cb321a3646ca4b8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. L. W. Schnetzer
2. Erin M. Buchanan
3. M. Sirgy
4. Stefan E. Schulenberg

In Social Psychology

1. L. W. Schnetzer
2. Erin M. Buchanan
3. M. Sirgy
4. Stefan E. Schulenberg
5. Muzaffer Uysal
6. J. Nawijn
7. Hye-Lina Kim
8. Dong-Jin Lee

Citations in the corpus

• The Purpose in Life Test-Short Form: Development and Psychometric Support (2011, methodology): “Schulenberg and Melton (2010) argued that one should have a good reason for developing a short form.”
• Theoretical Perspectives Guiding QOL Indicator Projects (2011, background): “More recently, Schulenberg and Melton (2010) have provided some evidence of construct validity in relation to the Purpose-in-Life (PIL) measure (Chamberlain and Zika 1988; Dyck 1987; Hicks and King 2007; Melton and Schulenberg 2008; Morgan and Farsides 2009).”