The interplay between colonization history and gene flow in passively dispersing zooplankton: microsatellite analysis of rotifer resting egg banks

By A. Gómez, G. Adcock, David H. Lunt, G. R. Carvalho. 2002

85 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A protein signal triggers sexual reproduction in Brachionus plicatilis (Rotifera) (2006, methodology): “The experimental population, RUS, was originally collected from the Azov Sea, Russia and is part of the Manjavacas clade as defined by phylogenetic analysis of COI and ITS genes (Gomez et al. 2002; Suatoni et al. 2005).”
Estimating F-statistics. (2002, methodology): “The paper is still widely cited; in the first three months of 2002 the methods it described were applied to data on ash trees (59), Barbus (86), barley (42), barnacle (22), butterfly (18), cherry (54), cod (44), cord grass (85), Drosophila (32), eelgrass (64), frog (84), housefly (23), insects (58, ”
The Monopolization Hypothesis and the dispersal–gene flow paradox in aquatic organisms (2002, background): “The data imply strongly that the northern refugium was located in the Iberian Peninsula, whereas the southern refugium may have been on the Iberian Peninsula or in Northern Africa.”
Dormancy and dispersal as mediators of zooplankton population and community dynamics along a hydrological disturbance gradient in inland temporary pools (2017, background): “In new habitats, for example, first founders may exert persistent effects through the build-up of an egg bank and largely determine the genetic structure of the population (Boileau et al., 1992; De Meester et al., 2002; Gómez et al., 2002; Thielsch et al., 2015).”