Dissociations Between Categorization and Recognition in Amnesic and Normal Individuals: An Exemplar-Based Interpretation
By Robert M. Nosofsky, Safa R. Zaki. 1998
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Safa R. Zaki
- Robert M. Nosofsky
- Brett K. Hayes
- Lance J. Rips
- Evan Heit
- Edward E. Smith
- Daniel R. Little
- T. Palmeri
Citations in the corpus
- Learning About Categories in the Absence of Training: Profound Amnesia and the Relationship Between Perceptual Categorization and Recognition Memory (1999, background): “Although a dissociation between categorization and recognition in amnesics and normal individuals has been taken as evidence for multiple memory systems (Knowlton & Squire, 1993), this dissociation may also be consistent with a single memory system (Nosofsky & Zaki, 1998).”
- Act-In: An integrated view of memory mechanisms (2014, background): “For example, Nosofsky and Zaki (1998) showed that the double dissociation between categorisation and recognition can be explained perfectly adequately by non-abstractionist theories of memory.”
- Memory, reasoning, and categorization: parallels and common mechanisms (2014, background): “Moreover, amnesics have been shown to accurately categorize tests instances that they do not recognize (e.g., Knowlton and Squire, 1993; Nosofsky and Zaki, 1998).”
- Formal Approaches in Categorization: The generalized context model: an exemplar model of classification (2011, unknown): “…used to account for varieties of other fundamental cognitive processes, including individual-item identification, the development of automaticity, and old-new recognition performance (e.g., Nosofsky, 1986 , 1987 , 1988 , 1991b ; Nosofsky & Zaki, 1998 ; Nosofsky & Stanton, 2006 ; Palmeri, 1997 ).”
- Is categorization performance really intact in amnesia? A meta-analysis (2004, methodology): “Following the exemplar model approach, Nosofsky and Zaki (1998) suggested that both This research was supported in part by funding from the Williams College Science Center and a McDonnell-Pew Consortium Grant.”
- Activation in the neural network responsible for categorization and recognition reflects parameter changes (2011, methodology): “We fitted these data using a baseline version of the exemplar model (17).”
- Concepts and categories: Memory, meaning, and metaphysics (2012, background): “Researchers have also directed efforts to distinguish decision-bound and exemplar models (e.g., Maddox & Ashby, 1998; Maddox, 1999; McKinley & Nosofsky, 1995; Nosofsky & Palmeri, 1997b; Nosofsky, 1998).”
- Theories of artificial grammar learning. (2007, background): “In categorization, individual representation of exemplars usually implies that they can be consciously activated; there have been correlations between exemplar recognition memory and corresponding exemplar categorization effects (Nosofsky & Zaki, 1998; Nosofsky, Clark, & Shin, 1989).”