A Framework for Dynamic Causal Inference in Political Science
By M. Blackwell. 2013
125 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Sociology and Political Science, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/729ea2cdada1d8fc1d1181a9d0f19e2ceb4dbe58
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Sociology and Political Science
- Kosuke Imai
- Marc Ratkovic
- M. Sen
- Brendan Nyhan
- Avidit Acharya
- M. Blackwell
- In Song Kim
- J. Montgomery
In Statistics and Probability
- Kosuke Imai
- Marc Ratkovic
- In Song Kim
- M. Blackwell
- Brendan Nyhan
- M. Sen
- J. Montgomery
- Michelle Torres
Citations in the corpus
- How Conditioning on Posttreatment Variables Can Ruin Your Experiment and What to Do about It (2018, background): “More recent work has amplified these points in the context of observational research (Blackwell 2013; Acharya, Blackwell, and Sen 2016).”
- Robust Estimation of Inverse Probability Weights for Marginal Structural Models (2015, methodology): “, Blackwell 2013). As explained by Robins, Hernán, and Brumback (2000), when estimating the causal effects of time-varying treatments, standard regression models fail to appropriately adjust for time-dependent observed confounders that are affected by previous treatments.”
- When Should We Use Unit Fixed Effects Regression Models for Causal Inference with Longitudinal Data? (2019, background): “Since fixed effects models can only adjust for unobserved confounders that are time-invariant, applied researchers often measure a vector of observed time-varying confounders (10)See Blackwell (2013) and Blackwell and Glynn (2018) for recent articles that introduce relevant modeling techniques under”
- Explaining Causal Findings Without Bias: Detecting and Assessing Direct Effects (2016, background): “See replication materials for more details.”