Glucose feeds the TCA cycle via circulating lactate

By Sheng Hui, J. Ghergurovich, Raphael J. Morscher, Cholsoon Jang, Xin Teng, Wenyun Lu, L. Esparza, T. Reya, L. Zhan, J. Y. Guo and 2 more. Nature, 2017

1,516 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Mammalian tissues are fuelled by circulating nutrients, including glucose, amino acids, and various intermediary metabolites. Under aerobic conditions, glucose is generally assumed to be burned fully by tissues via the tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA cycle) to carbon dioxide. Alternatively, glucose can be catabolized anaerobically via glycolysis to lactate, which is itself also a potential nutrient for tissues and tumours. The quantitative relevance of circulating lactate or other metabolic intermediates as fuels remains unclear. Here we systematically examine the fluxes of circulating metabolites in mice, and find that lactate can be a primary source of carbon for the TCA cycle and thus of energy. Intravenous infusions of 13C-labelled nutrients reveal that, on a molar basis, the circulatory turnover flux of lactate is the highest of all metabolites and exceeds that of glucose by 1.1-fold in fed mice and 2.5-fold in fasting mice; lactate is made primarily from glucose but also from other sources. In both fed and fasted mice, 13C-lactate extensively labels TCA cycle intermediates in all tissues. Quantitative analysis reveals that during the fasted state, the contribution of glucose to tissue TCA metabolism is primarily indirect (via circulating lactate) in all tissues except the brain. In genetically engineered lung and pancreatic cancer tumours in fasted mice, the contribution of circulating lactate to TCA cycle intermediates exceeds that of glucose, with glutamine making a larger contribution than lactate in pancreatic cancer. Thus, glycolysis and the TCA cycle are uncoupled at the level of lactate, which is a primary circulating TCA substrate in most tissues and tumours.

Subfields: Cancer Research, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/723e2408b71bcc7c64163e18fa4dc59dfd2c3028

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cancer Research

  1. Gabriele Multhoff
  2. G. Brooks
  3. Ping Gao
  4. P. Vaupel
  5. Joshua D. Rabinowitz
  6. Huafeng Zhang
  7. Linchong Sun
  8. A. Mayer

In Molecular Biology

  1. Cholsoon Jang
  2. Li Chen
  3. G. Brooks
  4. Ping Gao
  5. Gabriele Multhoff
  6. P. Vaupel
  7. Joshua D. Rabinowitz
  8. Huafeng Zhang

Citations in the corpus