Non-Darwinian evolution.

By J. L. King, T. Jukes. 1969

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Non-coding RNA: what is functional and what is junk? (2015, unknown): “They showed that the ability of natural selection to weed out slightly deleterious mutations depends on the size of the breeding population in a given species (Kimura, 1968, 1984; King and Jukes, 1969; Ohta, 1973).”
The changing faces of glutathione, a cellular protagonist. (2003, background): “Although the prevalence of Cys in proteins is increasing, the abundance has not yet reached the neutral frequency (i.e., the frequency that would be expected based on the number of Cys codons in the genetic code) (King and Jukes, 1969; Brooks and Fresco, 2002).”
Analysis of codon usage. (2000, background): “King and Jukes (1969) suggested that in the absence of mutational bias synonymous codons might be used randomly, this implied that synonymous mutations be evolving neutrally.”
The evolution of animal chemosensory receptor gene repertoires: roles of chance and necessity (2008, background): “First, non-synonymous nucleotide substitutions measured by d N do not necessarily indicate positive selection, because most amino-acid substitutions seem to be almost neutral, as shown by early molecular evolutionist”
The neutral theory of biodiversity: do the numbers add up? (2005, background): “This prompted the proposal of the neutral theory of molecular evolution (Kimura 1968; King & Jukes 1969; Kimura 1983), which postulated that most molecular evolution did not involve natural selection at all: in this model, selectively neutral mutations arose and their frequencies simply fluctuated”
The evolution of molecular markers — just a matter of fashion? (2004, background): “This surprisingly high amount of within-population polymorphism directly led to the neutral theory of molecular evolution, which states that most mutations are effectively neutra”
Genetic diversity and evolution of hepatitis C virus--15 years on. (2004, background): “…85 Downloaded from www.microbiologyresearch.org by IP: 54.70.40.11 On: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 00:06:04 highly controversial when proposed (Kimura, 1968; King & Jukes, 1969), neutral theory demonstrates that the majority of sequence change in and between species has no significant effect on phenotype,…”
Origin and evolution of the genetic code: the universal enigma (2008, background): “odons allocated to it (Hasegawa and Miyata 1980; Di Giulio 2005); the positive correlation between the number of synonymous codons for an amino acid and the frequency of the amino acid in 2 proteins (King and Jukes 1969; Gilis et al. 2001); the apparent minimization of the likelihood of mistranslati”