Effect of Conservation Strips on the Abundance and Distribution of Natural Enemies and Predation of Agrotis ipsilon (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on Golf Course Fairways
By S. Frank, P. Shrewsbury. 2004
111 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/72087658f60edae27685ead2369caa5dccb29b45
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Insect Science
Citations in the corpus
- Arthropod pest management in organic crops. (2007, background): “Conservation strips that comprise forbs and grasses effectively combine the two preceding concepts, thus increasing rates of predation (59).”
- Maximizing ecosystem services from conservation biological control: the role of habitat management. (2008, background): “20 Frank and Shrewsbury (2004) 1 1 1 1 + E L Ornamental”
- Habitat manipulation to mitigate the impacts of invasive arthropod pests (2010, background): “Frank and Shrewsbury (2004) combined beetle banks and flower strips to support ground living and foliage living natural”
- Impact of agricultural management on carabid communities and weed seed predation (2007, unknown): “Other studies have found similar correlations between natural enemy abundance and predation rates of insect pests (Menalled et al., 1999; Collins et al., 2002; Frank and Shrewsbury, 2004).”