Magazine Exposure: Internalization, Self-Objectification, Eating Attitudes, and Body Satisfaction in Male and Female University Students

By Marian M. Morry, Sandra L. Staska. 2001

426 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/71dd962e0ba33c834de54c2266e4e08616563147

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Gender Studies

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Objectification Theory as It Relates to Disordered Eating Among College Women (2004, background): “For example, magazine exposure (Morry & Staska, 2001), sexualized gaze (Hill & Fisher, 2004), trying on swimsuits (Fredrickson, Roberts, Noll, Quinn & Twenge, 1998), sports participation (Parsons & Betz, 2001), and ballet participation (Tiggemann & Slater, 2001) have been found to be related to…”
Body Image and Beliefs About Appearance: Constraints on the Leisure of College-Age and Middle-Age Women (2006, background): “Morry and Staska (2001) found that women reading beauty magazines internalized societal ideals, and this internalization predicted body shape dissatisfaction.”
Association of the Thin Body Ideal, Ambivalent Sexism, and Self-Esteem with Body Acceptance and the Preferred Body Size of College Women in Poland and the United States (2004, result): “Subsequent studies with the SATAQ have confirmed that the influence of internalization is stronger than the influence of exposure or awareness (Cusumano & Thompson, 1997; Griffiths et al., 1999; Jaberg, 2001; Smolak, Levine, & Thompson, 2001), and similar results have been found with different measu”
Average Joes: Men's relationships with media, real bodies, and sexuality (2006, background): “For example, frequent readers of fitness magazines report greater body image dissatisfaction (Morry & Staska, 2001) and a drive for muscularity (Botta, 2003; Duggan & McCreary, 2004; Hatoum & Belle, 2004; Morrison, Morrison, & Hopkins, 2003).”
Effect of Environment and Appearance Compliment on College Women's Self-Objectification, Mood, Body Shame, and Cognitive Performance (2008, background): “In particular, trait selfobjectification has now been associated with the reading of beauty magazines (Morry & Staska, 2001), attending ballet lessons as a child (Tiggemann & Slater, 2001), and being a member of a fitness center (Prichard & Tiggemann, 2005).”
Microaggressions and Women in Short-Term Psychotherapy: Initial Evidence (2010, background): “…incidents (e.g., degrading comments, gazes at their bodies, or sexual objectification) reported more psychological distress and shame about their physical appearance (also see Fredrickson, Roberts, Noll, Quinn, & Twenge, 1998; Moradi et al., 2005; Morry & Staska, 2001; Noll & Fredrickson, 1998).”
Body Objectification, MTV, and Psychological Outcomes Among Female Adolescents1 (2009, background): “…a week; they reported notably higher levels of self-objectification (M = 4.06) than did college-age women (M = 1.73 for Aubrey, 2006; M = -0.26 for Morry & Staska, 2001); they experienced relatively low levels of anxiety (M = 14.81; range = 11–33); 40% of the sample reported no symptoms of…”
Objectification Theory Predicts College Women’s Attitudes Toward Cosmetic Surgery (2010, background): “Empirical studies have demonstrated that both interpersonal forms (Hill and Fischer 2008; Kozee and Tylka 2006; Kozee et al. 2007; Moradi et al. 2005) and media forms (Harper and Tiggemann 2008; Morry and Staska 2001) of sexual objectification contribute to self-objectification.”
Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Interpersonal Sexual Objectification Scale (2007, background): “It is true that preliminary research has revealed that specific instances of sexual objectification, such as magazine exposure (Morry & Staska, 2001), trying on swimsuits (Fredrickson et al., 1998), sports participation (Parsons & Betz, 2001), ballet participation (Tiggemann & Slater, 2001), and…”
The mass marketing of disordered eating and Eating Disorders: The social psychology of women, thinness and culture (2006, background): “Not all individuals develop Eating Disorders, despite being exposed to these widely popularized images (Cusumano & Thompson, 1997; Morry & Staska, 2001; Stice, Schupak-Neuberg, Shaw, & Stein, 1994).”
Roles of Sexual Objectification Experiences and Internalization of Standards of Beauty in Eating Disorder Symptomatology: A Test and Extension of Objectification Theory. (2005, background): “More recently, Morry and Staska (2001) obtained an alpha of .85 with women in their study.”
Examining Objectification Theory (2008, background): “For example, magazine exposure (Morry & Staska, 2001), trying on swimsuits (Fredrickson, Roberts, Noll, Quinn, & Twenge, 1998), sports participation (Parsons & Betz, 2001), pressure to be thin (Tylka & Hill, 2004), and ballet participation (Tiggemann & Slater, 2001) have been found to be related to…”
Integrating Social Comparison Theory and Self-Esteem within Objectification Theory to Predict Women’s Disordered Eating (2010, background): “Assessments of sexual objectification, such as media exposure (Morry and Staska 2001), pressure to be thin (Tylka and Hill 2004), and sexualized body evaluation (Augustus-Horvath and Tylka 2009; Kozee and Tylka 2006; Kozee et al. 2007; Moradi et al. 2005) have been shown to predict U.S. and…”