The Use of Matching Methods in Higher Education Research: Answering Whether Attendance at a 2-Year Institution Results in Differences in Educational Attainment

119 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Impact of participation in extra-curricular activities during college on graduate employability: an empirical study of graduates of Taiwanese business schools (2014, methodology): “Notably, logð ui1 uiÞ can be converted to a predicted probability by 1 1þexpflogð uij1 uijÞg : Second, this study assessed the common support assumption by visually comparing histograms of the propensity scores of the matched participants (Reynolds and DesJardins 2009).”
Challenges and Opportunities for Improving Community College Student Success (2010, unknown): “…Alba & Lavin, 1981; Alfonso, 2006; Anderson, 1981; Breneman & Nelson, 1981; Doyle, 2008; Dougherty, 1987; Hilmer, 1997, 2000; Leigh & Gill, 2003; Long & Kurlaender, 2008; Melguizo, 2009; Reynolds, 2006; Reynolds & DesJardins, 2009; Rouse 1995, 1998; Stephan, Rosenbaum, & Person, 2009; Velez, 1985).”
The Community College Route to the Bachelor’s Degree (2015, methodology): “…are met, including achieving statistical balance on a range of substantively important covariates, it is argued that propensity models permit researchers to make causal inferences about the effect of a treatment (e.g., Guo & Fraser, 2010; Morgan & Winship, 2007; Reynolds & DesJardins, 2009).”