A Meta-analysis of the Reliabilty of Young's Internet Addiction Test

94 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

How "phubbing" becomes the norm: The antecedents and consequences of snubbing via smartphone (2016, background): “Participants responded on a 5-point scale (1 ¼ rarely; 5 ¼ always; a ¼ 0.89; Frangos, Frangos & Sotiropoulos, 2012) to measure mild, moderate, and severe Internet addictive behavior.”
The measurement of Internet addiction: A critical review of existing scales and their psychometric properties (2014, result): “The results of factor analyses revealed significant differences between studies suggested a potential lack of construct validity of the IAT, in addition to somewhat low reliability, which was highest among Asian and high-school student groups (Frangos et al., 2012).”