How "phubbing" becomes the norm: The antecedents and consequences of snubbing via smartphone

By Varoth Chotpitayasunondh, Karen McKenzie. Computers in Human Behavior, 2016

812 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Smartphones allow people to connect with others from almost anywhere at any time. However, there is growing concern that smartphones may actually sometimes detract, rather than complement, social interactions. The term "phubbing" represents the act of snubbing someone in a social setting by concentrating on one's phone instead of talking to the person directly. The current study was designed to examine some of the psychological antecedents and consequences of phubbing behavior. We examined the contributing roles of Internet addiction, fear of missing out, self-control, and smartphone addiction, and how the frequency of phubbing behavior and of being phubbed may both lead to the perception that phubbing is normative. The results revealed that Internet addiction, fear of missing out, and self-control predicted smartphone addiction, which in turn predicted the extent to which people phub. This path also predicted the extent to which people feel that phubbing is normative, both via (a) the extent to which people are phubbed themselves, and (b) independently. Further, gender moderated the relationship between the extent to which people are phubbed and their perception that phubbing is normative. The present findings suggest that phubbing is an important factor in modern communication that warrants further investigation. Internet addiction, FoMOs, and self-control predict smartphone addiction.Smartphone addiction predicts phubbing behavior and phubbee experiences.Phubbing and phubbee experiences predict the perceived normativity of phubbing.Gender moderates the relationship between phubbee experiences and perceived norms.

Subfields: Communication, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fee0dc874b008e3059641466e0518afe6c5660a9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

  1. Mark D. Griffiths
  2. Amandeep Dhir
  3. Shalini Talwar
  4. Ursula Oberst
  5. Andrés Chamarro
  6. Anushree Tandon
  7. Matti Mäntymäki
  8. James A. Roberts

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. Shalini Talwar
  2. Amandeep Dhir
  3. Mark D. Griffiths
  4. James A. Roberts
  5. Puneet Kaur
  6. Meredith E. David
  7. Anushree Tandon
  8. Matti Mäntymäki

Citations in the corpus