A Meta-Analytic Review of Racial-Ethnic Matching for African American and Caucasian American Clients and Clinicians.

By Sung-man Shin, C. Chow, Teresita Camacho-Gonsalves, Rachel Levy, I. Allen, H. Stephen Leff. 2005

102 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/719da445b520f3c286ae9661ea86eda60ca0cad7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

1. E. Gondolf

In Social Psychology

1. S. Quintana
2. E. Gondolf
3. T. Minami
4. Michael A. Jenkins-Guarnieri
5. Stephen L. Wright
6. J. Livingston
7. F. Leichsenring
8. S. Rabung

Citations in the corpus

• The weak evidence for batterer program alternatives (2011, background): “The contradictory findings, and debate over the reasons for them, extend over issues of matching clients and clinicians (Shin et al., 2005) and over acculturation and racial identity (Coleman, Wampold, & Casalie 1995).”
• Guidelines for Meta-Analyses of Counseling Psychology Research (2006, background): “Based on the earlier reasons, in the case of Shin et al. (2005), it would not have been appropriate for the researchers to eliminate a potential outlier based solely on the observed effect size of the study or the significance of the Q statistic unless they provided a solid explanation for doing so.”