A Cross-Country Investigation of the Determinants of Scope of E-commerce Use: An Institutional Approach
By Jennifer L. Gibbs, Kenneth L. Kraemer. Electronic Markets, 2004
488 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research, Media Technology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/715863cb40a958125cc8c6942840ff091f4ae319
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Tiago Oliveira
- John Day
- R. Rahayu
- Maria F. O. Martins
- Princely Ifinedo
- Constanza Bianchi
- Binshan Lin
- Shane Mathews
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Tiago Oliveira
- John Day
- Uchenna Cyril Eze
- Khong Sin Tan
- R. Rahayu
- Maria F. O. Martins
- Feng Li
- Princely Ifinedo
In Media Technology
- Tiago Oliveira
- Maria F. O. Martins
- John Day
- R. Rahayu
- Princely Ifinedo
- Constanza Bianchi
- Shane Mathews
Citations in the corpus
- Internet/e-business technologies acceptance in Canada's SMEs: An exploratory investigation (2011, background): “2010); at the same time, other IS researchers have failed to confirm this relationship (e.g., Goode & Stevens, 2000; Gibbs & Kraemer, 2004).”
- Determinant Factors of E-commerce Adoption by SMEs in Developing Country: Evidence from Indonesia☆ (2015, methodology): “This result is consistent with previous studies, such as Ramdani, Chevers, and Williams (2013);Tiago and Maria (2010); and, Iacovou et al. (1995). Even more so Zhu, Kraemer, and Xu (2006) found that technology readiness was the most critical factor in e-business adoption by business in developing co”
- Internet marketing capabilities and international market growth (2016, background): “Our study examines the application of Internet technology to a specific set of marketing capabilities such as advertising and marketing, online sales, after sales service and market research (Aspelund & Moen, 2004; Gibbs & Kraemer, 2004).”
- Literature Review of Information Technology Adoption Models at Firm Level (2011, methodology): “Some studies combine the TOE framework with the institutional theory (Gibbs and Kraemer 2004, Li 2008, Soares-Aguiar and Palma-Dos-Reis 2008).”
- Cloud computing adoption by SMEs in the north east of England: A multi-perspective framework (2013, background): “The impact of relative advantage on technology adoption has been widely investigated in previous studies (e.g. see Premkumar and King, 1994; Iacovou et al., 1995; Thong, 1999; Gibbs and Kraemer, 2004; Lee, 2004; Ramdani and Kawalek, 2008).”
- E-Commerce Technology Adoption: A Malaysian Grocery SME Retail Sector Study (2015, background): “For example, Gibbs and Kraemer (2004) suggest that the scope of EC adoption across ten different countries is influenced by national factors such as government policy and EC legislation.”
- Internet marketing and export market growth in Chile (2016, methodology): “…of Internet technology to a specific set of marketing activities that the literature commonly mentions: advertising and marketing, online sales, after-sales service and support, market research, and purchasing/procurement (Aspelund & Moen, 2004; Gibbs & Kraemer, 2004; Trainor et al., 2010).”
- Internet-based ICT adoption: evidence from Malaysian SMEs (2009, background): “commerce (e-commerce) to be increasingly diffused globally, bringing countries together into a global networked economy (Gibbs and Kraemer, 2004).”
- Firms patterns of e-business adoption: evidence for the European Union-27. (2009, background): “Empirical evidence suggests that competitive pressure is a powerful driver of IT adoption and diffusion (Al-Qirim 2007, Battisti et al. 2007, Dholakia and Kshetri 2004, Gibbs and Kraemer 2004, Grandon and Pearson 2004, Hollenstein 2004, Iacovou et al. 1995, Mehrtens et al. 2001, Zhu et al. 2003).”
- Understanding e-business adoption across industries in European countries (2010, background): “Other empirical studies also validate that positive perception of the benefits of an innovation provides an incentive for its use (Beatty et al., 2001; Gibbs and Kraemer, 2004; Grover and Teng, 1994; Hsu et al., 2006; Iacovou et al., 1995; Kuan and Chau, 2001; Lin and Lin, 2008; Premkumar et al., 19”