Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology

By H. Chesbrough. 2003

328 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/715273da7a7ea032b81af409c948179965d6eb2f

Citations in the corpus

Infrastructure: the social value of shared resources (2012, unknown): “…between monopoly power and the diffusion of innovation; Scotchmer, 2006), other areas, such as research on GPTs, are just touched upon (Bresnahan and Trajtenberg, 1995) or, like open innovation (Chesbrough, 2006) and the concept of an appropriability regime (Teece, 1986), are not discussed at all.”
Examining contemporary careers: A call for interdisciplinary inquiry (2008, unknown): “Organizations have now caught on to the opportunities of tapping into open knowledge sources, so that an increasing number now practice ‘open innovation’ seeking contributions from outside the organization, and around the globe (Chesbrough, 2003).”
Corporate social responsibility and innovative capacity: Intersection in a macro-level perspective (2018, unknown): “It can be found in various forms (product, market, process or social innovation), derived from diverse sources (closed vis-a-vis open innovation) and pertain to different scopes of change (disruptive, incremental or reapplied innovation) (Baldwin and Curley, 2007; Chesbrough, 2003; MacGregor and Fon”
- in-Progress (2012, unknown): “In short, open innovation requires both cultural and organization change and a break from the “not invented here” mindset (Chesbrough, 2003).”
A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the social innovation journey (2015, unknown): “…stakeholders, through an open process of participation, exchange and collaboration with relevant stakeholders, including end-users, thereby crossing organizational boundaries and jurisdictions (Hartley 2005; Bason 2010; Osborne and Brown 2011; Sorensen and Torfing 2011; Chesbrough 2003, 2006).”
DYNAMICS OF INDUSTRY AND INNOVATION: ORGANIZATIONS, NETWORKS AND SYSTEMS (2005, unknown): “In Open Innovation, the evidence adduced to support this model is taken almost exclusively from qualitative evidence in so-called " high technology " industries, such as computers, information technology, and pharmaceuticals (Chesbrough, 2003a;2003b;2003c; 2003d).”
Innovation intermediaries and collaboration: Knowledge–based practices and internal value creation (2018, unknown): “The knowledge-based view of the ﬁ rm (Kogut and Zander, 1996; Spender, 1996) as well as the open innovation literature (Chesbrough, 2003; Chesbrough, 2006; Dahlander and Gann, 2010) highlight that valuable knowledge exists not only within organisational boundaries, but also outside the ﬁ rm.”