Using deadbands to reduce communication in networked control systems
By P. G. Otanez, James R. Moyne, Dawn M. Tilbury. Proceedings of the 2002 American Control Conference (IEEE Cat. No.CH37301), 2002
337 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computational Theory and Mathematics, Control and Systems Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/713291dd54369b7f93ddddbd267861f1c63e2cc7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computational Theory and Mathematics
- Alexandre Seuret
- W. M. Heemels
- Emilia M. Fridman
- M.C.F. Donkers
- Karl Henrik Johansson
- Laurentiu Hetel
- Silviu-Iulian Niculescu
- Qing-Long Han
In Control and Systems Engineering
- Alexandre Seuret
- Emilia M. Fridman
- W. M. Heemels
- Qing-Long Han
- Jean-Pierre Richard
- Karl Henrik Johansson
- Silviu-Iulian Niculescu
- Laurentiu Hetel
Citations in the corpus
- Output-Based Event-Triggered Control With Guaranteed ${\cal L}_{\infty}$-Gain and Improved and Decentralized Event-Triggering (2012, background): “A more basic “emulation-based approach” is taken in [17]–[21].”
- The Emergence of Industrial Control Networks for Manufacturing Control, Diagnostics, and Safety Data (2007, methodology): “Oftentimes, determinism and jitter capabilities for lower level networked control are enhanced by utilizing techniques that minimize the potential for jitter through network contention, such as master–slave operation, polling techniques, and deadbanding [29], [ 44 ].”
- Event-triggered communication and control of networked systems for multi-agent consensus (2017, neutral): “…‘minimum attention control’ (Årzén, 1999; Åström & Bernhardsson, 1999, 2002; Brockett, 1997; Heemels, Sandee, & van den Bosch, 2008; Miskowicz, 2006; Mitchell & McDaniel, 1967; Otanez, Moyne, & Tilbury, 2002; Sandee, Heemels, & van den Bosch, 2005; Seuret, Prieur, & Marchand, 2014; Tabuada, 2007).”
- Recent developments on the stability of systems with aperiodic sampling: An overview (2017, background): “Various other types of triggering conditions have been proposed in the literature: send-on-delta (Lesbegue sampling, absolute triggering) [14,209,37], send-onenergy [175], send-on-area [176], Lyapunov sampling [260,238,63,221], etc.”
- Model-based periodic event-triggered control for linear systems (2013, background): “…see, for instance, Åström and Bernhardsson (2002), Gawthrop and Wang (2009), Heemels et al. (2008), Henningsson et al. (2008), Miskowicz (2006), Otanez et al. (2002), Tabuada (2007) andWang and Lemmon (2009) for the case of state-feedback and Donkers and Heemels (2012) and Kofman and…”
- An introduction to event-triggered and self-triggered control (2012, background): “, N}, it is equivalent to the event-triggering mechanism of [49], [45], [50].”
- Periodic event-triggered control for nonlinear systems (2013, neutral): “Similarly, the conditions of the form |e| ≥ ρ where ρ > 0 used in [3], [4], [13], [14] to practically stabilize the origin of nonlinear systems give Γ(e) = |e| − ρ.”
- Send-On-Delta Concept: An Event-Based Data Reporting Strategy (2006, background): “In the sensor/control networking community the magnitude-driven/level-crossing sampling is known as the send-on-delta [6,7,13] or deadbands [11].”