Acoustic interactions among male gray treefrogs, Hyla versicolor, in a chorus setting

By J. Schwartz, Bryant W. Buchanan, G. H.. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2002

129 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Vocal interactions in nightingales (Luscinia megarhynchos): more aggressive males have higher pairing success (2006, unknown): “…active overlapping of vocalizations, to speakers that started earlier than the other speaker, that is, whose vocalizations were overlapped (Miyazaki & Waas 2002); similar effects have been reported in anurans (e.g. Grafe 1996; Schwartz et al. 2002) and insects (e.g. Snedden & Greenfield 1998).”
The Behavioral Ecology of Anuran Communication (2007, background): “However, alternation between pairs of males may be inconsistent and so result in some acoustic interference (e.g., Schwartz et al. 2002; Gerhardt and Huber 2002).”
Mechanisms and Evolution of Communal Sexual Displays in Arthropods and Anurans (2005, background): “, 2000; Brush and Narins, 1989; Schwartz, 1993), whereas others have found little correlation between call‐timing interactions and distances separating the interacting callers (Schwartz et al., 2002).”
Effect of natural and synthetic noise on evoked vocal responses in a frog of the temperate austral forest (2005, background): “During vocal interactions, males compete with opponents by increasing the duration, amplitude, complexity and rate of emission of their calls and by modifying their dominant frequency (López et al. 1988; Wells 1988; Schwartz et al. 2002).”