Where Should We Intervene?

By R. K. Hanson, A. Harris. 2000

640 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Tony Ward
2. G. Willis
3. A. Beech
4. J. Levenson
5. Leam A. Craig
6. R. Mann
7. D. Thornton
8. P. Lussier

In Gender Studies

1. Tony Ward
2. A. Beech
3. G. Willis
4. D. Thornton
5. Jacquelyn W. White
6. Toni Hemmati
7. C. Stewart
8. J. Wormith

In Sociology and Political Science

1. G. Willis
2. Tony Ward
3. A. Beech
4. P. Lussier
5. R. Mann
6. D. Thornton
7. Leam A. Craig
8. J. Levenson

Citations in the corpus

• The accuracy, fairness, and limits of predicting recidivism (2018, background): “It also remains to be seen whether the addition of dynamic risk factors (for example, pro-offending attitudes and socio-affective problems) would improve prediction accuracy as previously suggested (12, 13) (we note, however, that COMPAS does use some dynamic risk factors that do not appear to impro”
• The Measures of Criminal Attitudes and Associates (MCAA) (2004, background): “Stable variables have also been found to add to the prediction of recidivism over and above static variables alone (Beech, Friendship, Erickson, & Hanson, 2002; Hanson & Harris, 2000; Mills, Kroner, & Hemmati, in press).”
• Desistance and Attitudes Towards Sex Offenders: Facilitation or Hindrance? (2010, background): “The available research indicates that if released sex offenders are provided with the resources to access stable housing, establish pro-social support networks, create intimate relationships, and are presented with opportunities for employment, they are less likely to sexually reoffend (e.g., Hanso”
• The Relationship of Statistical and Psychological Risk Markers to Sexual Reconviction in Child Molesters (2007, background): “Distorted beliefs in sexual offenders are well supported within the literature (Beech, Fisher, & Beckett, 1999; Hanson & Harris, 2000; Hanson & Scott; 1995; Pithers et al., 1988; Ward, Louden, Hudson, & Marshall, 1995) as offense precursors consistent in both child molesters (Beech et al., 1999;…”
• A Comparison of Predictors of General and Violent Recidivism Among High-Risk Federal Offenders (2002, background): “Follow-up research indicates that the VRAG provides a good estimate of violent and sexual recidivism among federally sentenced offenders (Barbaree, Seto, Langton, & Peacock, 2001; Bélanger & Earls, 1996; Hanson & Harris, 2000; Kroner & Mills, 1997; Rice, 1999).”
• Assessing Risk for Sexual Recidivism: Some Proposals on the Nature of Psychologically Meaningful Risk Factors (2010, background): “Hanson and Harris (2000) further divided dynamic risk factors into stable risk factors (relatively enduring problems, such as alcoholism and personality disorders) and acute risk factors (rapidly changing features that signal the timing of reoffending, such as intoxication or emotional collapse).”
• Two studies on the prevalence and validity of personality disorder in three forensic intellectual disability samples (2006, result): “This is somewhat at odds with previous research with mainstream populations, where personality disorder has been considered a risk factor for future sexual offending (Hanson & Harris, 2000; Quinsey et al., 1998).”
• Sexual Assault Perpetration and Reperpetration (2004, background): “Most work on sexual assault recidivism has been done with court-adjudicated offenders (Hanson & Harris, 2000).”
• The Predictive Validity of a General Risk/Needs Assessment Inventory on Sexual Offender Recidivism and an Exploration of the Professional Override (2012, background): “…Risk Assessment for Sexual Offense Recidivism [RRASOR; Hanson, 1997], STATIC-99 [Hanson & Thornton, 2000], Sex Offender Need Assessment Rating [Hanson & Harris, 2000a], STABLE-2007 [Hanson, Harris, Scott, & Helmus, 2007], ACUTE [Hanson et al., 2007], Risk Matrix 2000–Sexual [Thornton et al.,…”
• The role and relevance of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in court: A case law survey of U.S. courts (1991-2004). (2006, background): “R had demonstrated modest to moderate predictive validity with respect to sexual offenses (Dempster, 1998; Firestone et al., 1999; Hanson & Harris, 2000; Rice & Harris, 1997), particularly when used in conjunction with measures of sexual deviance (Hare, 2003).”
• Patterns of criminal achievement in sexual offending: Unravelling the “successful” sex offender (2011, background): “…having alcohol and/or drug-related problems, showing a lengthy criminal record, criminally versatile, using violence in the commission of sex crime, while targeting extrafamilial or stranger victims (e.g., Epperson et al., 2003; Hanson & Thornton, 2000; Hanson & Harris, 2000; Quinsey et al., 1998).”