Evolutionary origins of morality : cross-disciplinary perspectives
By L. Katz. 2000
109 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/708f695d125b668d35589fd2d66ffca423e44803
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- L. M. Pereira
- Ari Saptawijaya
- Jonathan A Lanman
- Justin L. Barrett
- P. Ehrlich
- R. Nesse
- Kiley Hamlin
- Mark Schaller
Citations in the corpus
- Moral Judgment and Action in Preverbal Infants and Toddlers (2013, background): “Indeed, scholarly interest in such an innate moral core has blossomed in recent years (e.g., Haidt & Joseph, 2007; Hamlin, 2010; Joyce, 2006; Katz, 2000; Mikhail, 2011; Premack & Premack, 1994).”
- Modelling morality with prospective logic (2007, background): “This interest comes from various (cid:12)elds, e.g. primatology (de Waal, 2006), cognitive sciences (Hauser, 2007; Mikhail, 2007), neuroscience (Tancredi, 2005), and other various interdisciplinary perspectives (Joyce, 2006; Katz, 2002).”
- Runaway Social Selection for Displays of Partner Value and Altruism (2007, background): “Katz L (2000) Evolutionary Origins of Morality: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives.”
- Human Natures, Nature Conservation, and Environmental Ethics (2002, background): “…Dunbar et al. 1999, Ehrlich 2000) and a substantial one on the evolution of ethics and norms— which is of special interest to those of us concerned with human behavior toward the environment (Bischof 1978, Axelrod 1986, Alexander 1987, Boyd and Richerson 1992, Cronk 1994, Boehm 1997, Katz 2000).”
- The science of religious beliefs (2008, background): “While the exact catalogue of immoral actions is still a matter of investigation and debate, intragroup murder, adultery, theft, deception and cowardice are strong candidates, as people tend to view rules involving such actions as immutable, even for those in power (Katz, 2000).”