Measuring the performance of intellectual potential in the knowledge economy

By A. Pulic. 2002

703 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/708bebbe69caebcd281c5e18425cc645cee9816d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Intellectual Capital and Corporate Performance of Technology-Intensive Companies: Malaysia Evidence (2008, background): “Many researchers (Edvinsson and Malone, 1997; Stewart, 1997; Pulic, 1998; Pulic, 1999 and Sveiby, 2000) advocate that traditional measures of a company’s performance, which are based on conventional accounting principles, may be unsuitable in the knowledge-based economy which is driven by…”
The Impact of Intellectual Capital on Firm Performance: A Modified and Extended VAIC Model (2020, methodology): “Chang (2007) added innovation capital and intellectual property capital to Pulic (1998)’s VAIC model.”
Charting intellectual capital performance of the gateway to China (2011, background): “A growing number of leading academics and business practitioners acknowledge that the economy worldwide is being transformed into a “knowledge-based economy”, where economic value is seen mainly to be derived from intellectual capital (“IC”), rather than just from physical capital (Sveiby , 1997; Pu”
The association between intellectual capital and financial performance in the Islamic banking industry (2019, methodology): “The following formula is used to measure the VA (Pulic, 1998, 2000; Firer and Williams, 2003): VA = output input.”
Intellectual Capital Efficiency and Firm’s Performance: Study on Malaysian Financial Sectors (2009, methodology): “However in this study, intellectual capital was measured by human capital, structural capital and capital employed as suggested by Pulic (1998) and Firer and Williams (2003).”
The intellectual capital performance of the Indian banking sector (2007, methodology): “Various methods have been devised to measure the valuation of IC, ranging from the traditional Tobin’s Q method to the Balanced Scorecard approach (Kaplan and Norton, 1996) to the Intangible Asset Score Sheet (Sveiby, 1989) and the latest Value Added Intellectual Coefficiente (Pulic, 1998), since th”
An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Intellectual Capital and Firms’ Market Value and Financial Performance (2005, methodology): “VAIC is being increasingly used in business (e.g. Pulic, 1998, 2000a, b) and academic applications (e.g. Firer and Williams, 2003).”
Intellectual capital and bank productivity in emerging markets: evidence from Ghana (2016, methodology): “VAICTM is a registered trademark of Pulic (2001).”
Intellectual Capital and its Effect on Financial Performance of Banks: Evidence from Saudi Arabia (2014, methodology): “This study adopts the value added intellectual coefficient (VAIC) developed by Pulic (1998) to measure IC performance of commercial banks in Saudi Arabia.”
Ownership Structure and Intellectual Capital Performance in Malaysia (2009, methodology): “These include the EVA and MVA models (Bontis, Dragonetti, Jacobsen & Roos, 1999), Tobin's Q (Tobin, 1969), Calculated Intangible Value (Stewart, 1997), Matching Assets to Earnings (Lev, 2001), Value Added Intellectual Capital Coefficient (Pulic, 1998) and many others.”
Intellectual Capital Performance of Indonesian Banking Sector: A Modified VAIC (M-VAIC) Perspective (2014, background): “The model which is very popular in many countries is Value Added Intellectual Coefficient (VAIC™) developed by Pulic (1998).”
Human capital efficiency and firm performance across sectors in an emerging market (2020, methodology): “This paper uses the VAIC method to measure human capital efficiency (Pulic, 1998; 2000).”