Treatment of heavy quarks in deeply inelastic scattering

By Michael Krämer, F. Olness, Davison E. Soper. 2000

148 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We investigate a simplied version of the ACOT prescription for calculating deeply inelastic scattering from Q 2 values near the squared mass M 2 H of a heavy quark to Q 2

Subfields: Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/707f675ddd66b01e3a80bda31272d1db71a7f9c8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

Citations in the corpus

b-initiated processes at the LHC: a reappraisal (2012, methodology): “Several variants of this method were subsequently proposed, such as S-ACOT [45] or ACOT-χ [46], which include some improvements and/or simplifications with respect the original ACOT scheme.”
Heavy-flavour and quarkonium production in the LHC era: from proton–proton to heavy-ion collisions (2015, methodology): “) as is done in the S-ACOT scheme [19].”
The high energy neutrino cross-section in the Standard Model and its uncertainty (2011, methodology): “The PDFs considered here all account for the heavy quark production using general mass variable flavour number schemes, although the specific schemes differ: MSTW2008 and HERAPDF1.5 use the Thorne-Roberts scheme [32, 33], whereas CT10/CTEQ6.6 use the ACOT scheme [ 48 ].”
A critical appraisal and evaluation of modern PDFs (2016, methodology): “In addition, the schemes SACOT(χ ) and RT optimal as well as FONLL-C [162] of NNPDF3.”
Higgs boson production in bottom quark fusion at next-to-next-to-leading order (2003, background): “This resummation can be achieved by introducing bottom quark parton distribution functions which conta i all the collinear terms arising from the splitting of gluons i to bb̄ pairs [18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28].”