A critical appraisal and evaluation of modern PDFs

By Alberto Accardi, S. Alekhin, J. Blumlein, Maria Vittoria Garzelli, K. Lipka, W. Melnitchouk, Sven-Olaf Moch, J. Owens, R. Plačakytė, E. Reya and 3 more. 2016

145 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We review the present status of the determination of parton distribution functions (PDFs) in the light of the precision requirements for the LHC in Run 2 and other future hadron colliders. We provide brief reviews of all currently available PDF sets and use them to compute cross sections for a number of benchmark processes, including Higgs boson production in gluon–gluon fusion at the LHC. We show that the differences in the predictions obtained with the various PDFs are due to particular theory assumptions made in the fits of those PDFs. We discuss PDF uncertainties in the kinematic region covered by the LHC and on averaging procedures for PDFs, such as advocated by the PDF4LHC15 sets, and provide recommendations for the usage of PDF sets for theory predictions at the LHC.

Subfields: Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/512faecbea97ea0c00ee9060873072d78096e930

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. Atlas Collaboration
  2. Cms Collaboration
  3. Gudrun Heinrich
  4. M. Schönherr
  5. Juan Rojo
  6. A. Larkoski
  7. Ansgar Denner
  8. S. Höche

Citations in the corpus