Beyond Self-Report: Tools to Compare Estimated and Real-World Smartphone Use

By Sally Andrews, D. Ellis, Heather Shaw, L. Piwek. PLoS ONE, 2015

366 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Psychologists typically rely on self-report data when quantifying mobile phone usage, despite little evidence of its validity. In this paper we explore the accuracy of using self-reported estimates when compared with actual smartphone use. We also include source code to process and visualise these data. We compared 23 participants’ actual smartphone use over a two-week period with self-reported estimates and the Mobile Phone Problem Use Scale. Our results indicate that estimated time spent using a smartphone may be an adequate measure of use, unless a greater resolution of data are required. Estimates concerning the number of times an individual used their phone across a typical day did not correlate with actual smartphone use. Neither estimated duration nor number of uses correlated with the Mobile Phone Problem Use Scale. We conclude that estimated smartphone use should be interpreted with caution in psychological research.

Subfields: Communication, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b559f2f7bd10f8d22d2a7c2cb3c563c1a9fcee51

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

  1. Jacob T. Fisher
  2. Brittany I. Davidson
  3. Daniel S. Quintana
  4. Maarten W. Bos
  5. Douglas A. Parry
  6. C. Sewall
  7. Hannah Mieczkowski

In Literature and Literary Theory

  1. Michel Tuan Pham
  2. Shiri Melumad

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. Jacob T. Fisher
  2. Brittany I. Davidson
  3. Daniel S. Quintana
  4. Maarten W. Bos
  5. Jason M. Chein
  6. Douglas A. Parry
  7. Lauren E. Sherman
  8. C. Sewall

Citations in the corpus