Fiscal Decentralization: A Political Theory with Latin American Cases

By Christopher Garman, Stephan Haggard, Eliza J. Willis. 2001

350 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7045fed2081b575440c63708723c1fbb7e4d71aa

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

Accountability and Corruption: Political Institutions Matter (2001, background): “This increases accountability and gives time for other political institutions to materialize their effects; see Linz (1990), Linz and Stepan (1996), Tirole (1996), Bailey and Valenzuela (1997), Rose-Ackerman (1999), and Garman et al. (2001).”
Second Generation Fiscal Federalism: Political Aspects of Decentralization and Economic Development (2014, neutral): “and Zhuravskaya (2002), Garman et al. (2000), Rodden (2006), Rodden”
Racing to the Bottom or to the Top? Decentralization, Revenue Pressures, and Governance Reform in China (2017, neutral): “Our findings contribute to the literature on decentralization in two ways: First, the use of fiscal resources and central transfers to enforce obedience to central mandates is a common theme in the fiscal decentralization literature (Garman et al. 2001, Rodden 2004, Diaz-Cayeros 2006).”
The Impact of Fiscal Decentralization: A Survey (2015, neutral): “According to data gathered by Garman et al. (2001), more than 80% of the seventy-five developing countries analyzed had been undergoing some decentralization of authority by the beginning of the millennium. The picture is quite the same in developed countries. The index of regional authority compute”
Explaining Fiscal Decentralisation: Geography, Colonial History, Economic Development and Political Institutions (2006, background): “Two important exceptions are Panizza (1999) and Garman et al. (2001).”
Second generation fiscal federalism: The implications of fiscal incentives (2009, background): “9 See Blanchard and Shleifer (2000), Chhibber and Kollman (2004), Filippov et al. (2003), Garman et al. (2000), and Jones et al. (2000).”
MADISON IN BAGHDAD?: Decentralization and Federalism in Comparative Politics (2006, background): “…Aldrich 1995), a central focus of recent research has been on the role of political parties in shaping everything from decentralizing trends to ethnic conflict to policy divergence across levels of government (Garman et al. 2001, Samuels 2003, Filippov et al. 2004, Rodden 2005, Wibbels 2005a).”
A Sequential Theory of Decentralization: Latin American Cases in Comparative Perspective (2005, background): “Previous studies have successfully accounted for varying degrees of fiscal decentralization at one point in time (e.g., Garman, Haggard, and Willis 2001), but have fallen short of explaining the effects of decentralization policies on the evolution of intergovernmental relations.”