The Korean language

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

TyDi QA: A Benchmark for Information-Seeking Question Answering in Typologically Diverse Languages (2020, neutral): “There is extensive discourse-level pro-drop (Sohn, 2001).”
MORPHOLOGICAL AND SYNTACTIC TRANSFER IN CHILD L2 ACQUISITION OF THE ENGLISH DATIVE ALTERNATION (2002, background): “Thus, in Korean there are two forms: (a) the construction with the benefactive cwu-, which alternately allows double-accusative structure, as in (8); and (b) the construction with -ulwihay “for” (known in traditional Korean grammar as an “adverbializer”; Sohn, 1999), as in (11).”
Heritage Languages: In the 'Wild' and in the Classroom (2007, background): “…home language, and consist of “overhearers” (Au et al. 2002, Oh et al. 2003), who heard the home language in the background but never responded in it and were not addressed in it consistently, and bilinguals who switched to the dominant language as early as preschool (Polinsky 1997, Montrul 2004a).”
Vowels and Consonants (2000, unknown): “Many Korean phonologists support the ten‐vowel system (Kuklo Lee 1932; Hi Seung Lee 1955; W. Kim 1963; Huh 1965; M. Kim 1992; Ho Young Lee 1996; P. Lee and M. Choi 1997; I. Lee and Ramsey 2000; O. Kang 2003; J. Lee 2005).”