Voice Assimilation and Segment Reduction in Casual Dutch. A Corpus-based Study of the Phonology-phonetics Interface
By Mirjam Ernestus. 2000
232 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7021715e35fdc404a91fdce097b697c59a7161cd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
Citations in the corpus
- An introduction to reduced pronunciation variants [Editorial] (2011, background): “…often disagree with each other (disagreements on about 15% of the tokens are no exception, see, e.g., Coussé, Gillis, Kloots, & Swerts, 2004; Ernestus, 2000; Pitt, Johnson, Hume, Kiesling, & Raymond, 2005) and one and the same transcriber may make different decisions for the same stretch…”
- Praat script to detect syllable nuclei and measure speech rate automatically (2009, background): “For example, Ernestus (2000, pp. 129–132) explains that unstressed vowels and even adjacent consonants may be absent—in particular, for casual Dutch.”