Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions.
By Philippe Ferrara, Holger Gohlke, D. J. Price, Gerhard Klebe, Charles L. Brooks III. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2004
440 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computational Theory and Mathematics, Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/70100602b516b5c3b641a7ad8557b5512c8ad756
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computational Theory and Mathematics
- Shengyou Huang
- Xiaoqin Zou
- Vincent Zoete
- Olivier Michielin
- Aurélien Grosdidier
- Ming-Jing Hwang
- Zhong-Ru Xie
- Gerhard Klebe
In Molecular Biology
- Shengyou Huang
- Xiaoqin Zou
- Vincent Zoete
- Olivier Michielin
- Aurélien Grosdidier
- Jens Meiler
- Ming-Jing Hwang
- Zhong-Ru Xie
In Organic Chemistry
- Shengyou Huang
- Xiaoqin Zou
- Gerhard Klebe
- Vincent Zoete
- Olivier Michielin
- Aurélien Grosdidier
- Jens Meiler
- Jason C. Cole
Citations in the corpus
- EADock: Docking of small molecules into protein active sites with a multiobjective evolutionary optimization (2007, background): “29 It is worth mentioning that the ROI used with ICM was not described, and it is not possible to exclude that it encompasses only a restricted number of putative binding modes.”
- Virtual ligand screening: strategies, perspectives and limitations (2006, background): “116 Ferrara, P. et al. (2004) Assessing scoring functions for protein–ligand interactions.”
- Advances and Challenges in Protein-Ligand Docking (2010, background): “Although many comparison studies for docking and scoring have been published [158–166], publicly available docking benchmarks such as DUD (http://dud.”