Modelling household income dynamics
By S. Jenkins. 2000
359 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6fd2c8f31a78791334bb08fe367fd9a9cb8d81fd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Science and Operations Research
- A. Poggi
- Francesco Devicienti
- Lorenzo Cappellari
- Richard Layte
- D. Fouarge
- Conchita D'Ambrosio
- Satya R. Chakravarty
- Walter Bossert
In Sociology and Political Science
- A. Poggi
- Francesco Devicienti
- Lorenzo Cappellari
- Conchita D'Ambrosio
- S. Jenkins
- Richard Layte
- D. Fouarge
- Satya R. Chakravarty
Citations in the corpus
- Welfare Regimes and Poverty Dynamics: The Duration and Recurrence of Poverty Spells in Europe (2005, methodology): “Following Stevens (1999) and Jenkins and Rigg (2001) we specify a discretetime hazard rate model, which estimates the probability of making a transition”
- Poverty and social exclusion: two sides of the same coin or dynamically interrelated processes? (2011, methodology): “5 See Heitmueller and Michaud (2006) and Miranda (2007) for applications of the model of Alessie et al.”
- Modelling low income transitions (2002, methodology): “…nine waves.5 Otherwise most British research on poverty dynamics has simply documented low income transition rates for different groups and used bivariate ‘trigger event’ methods to investigate poverty determinants (see for example Jarvis and Jenkins, 1997; Jenkins, 2000; Jenkins and Rigg, 2001).”
- Poverty dynamics: empirical evidence for Canada (2003, background): “Conversely, authors (e.g., Jenkins 2000) who have explored poverty and family status indicate that the latter is a crucial factor, and such dynamics form an important part of our analysis with the massive sample size of the LAD allow- ing us to pursue these issues in further depth than elsewhere.”
- Who Stays Poor? Who Becomes Poor? Evidence from the British Household Panel Survey (2002, neutral): “Most research has documented low income transition rates for different groups and used bivariate ‘trigger event’ methods to analyse causes (see for example Jarvis and Jenkins, 1997; Jenkins, 2000).”
- The dynamics of health in the British Household Panel Survey (2004, background): “We 1 Analysis of the dynamics of income and poverty is well established (see Jenkins, 2000 for a review) but the empirical analysis of health dynamics has received little attention.”
- Poverty persistence in Britain: A multivariate analysis using the BHPS, 1991–1997 (2002, methodology): “There ate various reasons in favor and agalnst such a practise [ Jenkins (1999) ].”
- Poverty and time (2012, methodology): “…measurement has recognized for some time the importance of being able to distinguish between chronic and transitory poverty and proposes alternative methods for capturing the relevant phenomenon; for surveys of this literature, see, among others, Rodgers and Rodgers (1993) and Jenkins (2000).”