Relationship Between Visual and Kinesthetic Imagery, Field Dependence-Independence, and Complex Motor Skills
By Aymeric Guillot, Christian Collet, A. Dittmar. 2004
94 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6fcaf8b4f2a6dfce96ee063075c695db86c2e0b2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
In Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Citations in the corpus
- Understanding the timing of motor imagery: recent findings and future directions (2012, background): “Guillot, Collet, and Dittmar ( 2004 ) compared the temporal features of MI and actual practice in a population of expert gymnasts and tennis players.”
- Construction of the Motor Imagery Integrative Model in Sport: a review and theoretical investigation of motor imagery use (2008, background): “Specific characteristics of motor performance were shown to be enhanced by different types of MI (White & Hardy, 1995; Hardy & Callow, 1999; Guillot et al., 2004).”
- Functional neuroanatomical networks associated with expertise in motor imagery (2008, unknown): “This quantitative measure of MI is now well-established, and ANS patterns have even been found to differentiate between good and poor imagers (Roure et al., 1999; Guillot et al., 2004).”
- Effects of motor imagery training on service return accuracy in tennis: The role of imagery ability (2007, methodology): “…(Isaac, 1992) It is therefore postulated that good imagers generate more easily a mental representation of action than poor imagers As suggested by Guillot et al (2004), poor imagers doubtlessly encountered greater IJSEP 5-2.indb 182 183 difficulties to form vivid and accurate images of movement…”