The Origin, Expansion and Demise of Plant Species

By R. Abbott. Heredity, 2001

188 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6f43c93d53e11b530e41ab3bdc4982561ec4a34d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. D. Richardson
2. Petr Pyšek
3. D. Soltis
4. Pamela S. Soltis
5. M. te Beest
6. J. L. Le Roux
7. T. Givnish
8. R. Petit

Citations in the corpus

• A Quantitative Survey of Local Adaptation and Fitness Trade‐Offs (2009, background): “vol. 173, no. 5 the american naturalist may 2009 A Quantitative Survey of Local Adaptation and Fitness Trade-Offs Joe Hereford* National Evolutionary Synthesis Center, Durham, North Carolina 27705”
• Polyploidy and angiosperm diversification. (2009, background): “Given the many purported benefi ts of polyploidy (e.g., Levin, 1983 , 2000 , 2002 ) and the suggested relationship of genome duplication to speciation ( Werth and Windham, 1991 ; Lynch and Force, 2000 ; Lynch and Conery, 2000 ), rates of diversifi cation may be higher in polyploid lineages than in…”
• Divergent and narrower climatic niches characterize polyploid species of European primroses in Primula sect. Aleuritia (2013, unknown): “Despite intensive studies on speciation for over 150 years (Darwin, 1859; Mayr, 1947; Levin, 2000), the relationship between adaptation to different environmental conditions and species divergence remains poorly understood (Coyne & Orr, 2004).”
• Biological invasions at the gene level (2004, background): “Key words Alien, genetic assimilation, gene flow, homogenization, hybridization, introgression, invasibility, invasiveness, native, Quercus , Spartina .”
• The more the better? The role of polyploidy in facilitating plant invasions. (2012, background): “Plant species originate, expand, differentiate and, eventually, decline (Levin, 2000).”
• Polyploidy in Plants (2005, background): “Comprehensive reviews of species concepts are given in Grant (1981), Templeton (1989), Baum (1992), Rieseberg (1994), Baum & Donoghue (1995), Davis (1997), Levin (2000), Wheeler & Meier (2000), Coyne & Orr (2004), and Futuyma (1998, 2005).”
• Can indirect selection and genetic context contribute to trait diversification? A transition‐probability study of blossom‐colour evolution in two genera (2002, background): “Epling & Dobzhansky, 1942; Wright, 1943; Wilson & Thomson, 1996), although these are not considered major contributors to diversity in the absence of selection (but see discussions of other nonadaptive mechanisms in Armbruster, 1996; Wilson & Thomson, 1996; Levin, 2000).”
• Ecotypes and the controversy over stages in the formation of new species (2012, background): “Levin (1993, 1995, 2000) argued that species formation occurs almost exclusively at the level of the local population or meta-population (Barrett, 2001; Wilson & Kimball, 2001).”
• The role of hybridization in plant speciation. (2009, background): “Comprehensive reviews of species concepts are given elsewhere (18, 19, 37, 41, 58, 59, 66, 97, 155, 203, 216).”
• Ecology of plant speciation (2010, background): “…hybridization, and environ mental barriers to gene flow in generating genetic differences among popula tions and incipient mating barriers (Dobzhansky, 1937, 1951; Mayr, 1942, 1963, 1970; Stebbins, 1950, 1971; V. Grant, 1963, 1981; Levin, 2000; D.E. Soltis & al., 2004; P.S. Soltis & Soltis, 2009).”