T-to-C Movement: Causes and Consequences

834 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Syntax of Valuation and the Interpretability of Features (2006, background): “(See Pesetsky and Torrego (2001) for details.)”
Morphological and Abstract Case (2008, background): “My explication of ABS DEF languages includes languages that show an ergative split based on a nominal hierarchy.”
The Scale of Finiteness and the Calculus of Control (2004, methodology): “The traditional intuition, that I0 and C0 are somehow matched for different clause types, is rendered by the checking of [T] between I0 and C0 (for a recent implementation, see Pesetsky and Torrego 2001).”
The Syntax and Semantics of Unselected Embedded Questions (2001, methodology): “15 We have placed whether in the specifier of CP, following Pesetsky and Torrego (2000) and much other work.”
Interpretation of English multiple wh-questions by Japanese speakers: a missing uninterpretable feature account (2006, background): “Uninterpretable features are the counterparts of interpretable features (Pesetsky and Torrego, 2001) but are not usable by the semantic component.”
Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: A First Phase Syntax (2008, neutral): “151 5.6 Completive Complex Predicates in Indic . . . . . . . . . . . . . .155 5.7 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 162”