The Impact of Stakeholder Orientation on Innovation: Evidence from a Natural Experiment

By Caroline Flammer, Aleksandra J. Kacperczyk. Management Sciences, 2016

414 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6f2b4459f903711dc9ea335ead94144a0d56c41c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Does a Long-Term Orientation Create Value? Evidence from a Regression Discontinuity (2017, background): “Specifically, by catering to the interests and needs of employees, firms can improve their labor productivity (Flammer, 2015; Flammer and Luo, 2015), innovative productivity (Flammer and Kacperczyk, 2016), and long-term value creation (e.”
The influence of corporate social responsibility on investment efficiency and innovation (2019, unknown): “In contrast, Flammer and Kacperczyk (2016) omit certain categories (i.e., human rights and product) of strengths and do not subtract KLD concerns from the strengths to arrive at a net score.”
Corporate Governance and Executive Compensation for Corporate Social Responsibility (2015, unknown): “KLD ratings are among the most influential and widely studied measures of CSR used in prior literature (Berman et al., 1999; Chatterji et al., 2009; Flammer and Kacperczyk, 2015; Servaes and Tamayo, 2013; and Werner, 2014).”
Corporate social responsibility, product market perception, and firm value (2020, unknown): “…(1993), North Dakota (1993), Connecticut (1997), Vermont (1998), Maryland (1999), and Texas (2006).10 We follow Bertrand and Mullainathan (2003) and Flammer and Kacperczyk (2016) and run the following regression: Product Perceptioniklt = αi + αt + αi × αt + γXiklt + δ Constituency Statutekt…”
Do Stakeholder Orientation and Environmental Proactivity Impact Firm Profitability? (2017, unknown): “However, shareholder orientation can focus on long-term horizons rather than immediate payoffs (Flammer and Kacperczyk 2016).”
Competing for Government Procurement Contracts: The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility (2018, unknown): “An analogous issue arises in the innovation literature, when researchers study log(1 + patents) to jointly examine the extensive and intensive margins of patenting (see, e.g., Atanassov, 2013; Flammer and Kacperczyk, 2016).”
Strategic CSR: A Concept Building Meta‐Analysis (2019, unknown): “Employees may be more willing to share information with the firm (Aragón-Correa et al., 2013; Harrison et al., 2010), and be better able to overcome the sort of short-term orientation that tends to impede innovation (Flammer and Kacperczyk, 2016; Wang and Bansal, 2012).”
Green credit policy and firm performance: What we learn from China (2021, background): “Corporate development depends on its stakeholders, and there is a close relationship between them (Casciaro and Piskorski, 2005; Flammer and Kacperczyk, 2016), therefore, the stakeholder theory is put forward to remind firms to undertake wider charitable and ethical responsibilities while realizing ”
The Sustainability Footprint of Institutional Investors (2018, unknown): “Typically, researchers use the enactment of these constituency statutes in a difference-in-differences (DID) framework (see, for instance, Flammer and Kacperczyk (2016)).”
Strategic management during the financial crisis: How firms adjust their strategic investments in response to credit market disruptions (2021, background): “Second, communication and collaboration with the firm’s stakeholders are important factors in the firm’s processes—e.g., in the innovation process (Eisenhardt, 1989; Flammer and Kacperczyk, 2016) and the supply chain process (Homburg, Stierl, and Bornemann, 2013).”