The Tragedy of Great Power Politics
By J. Mearsheimer. 2001
2,159 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6f10ebe571ed62f6f8361e13b3b12a5226e8c20c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Political Science and International Relations
Citations in the corpus
- Same War—Different Views: Germany, Japan, and Counterterrorism (2003, neutral): “See Waltz 1979; and Mearsheimer 2001.”
- Scraps of Paper? Agreements and the Durability of Peace (2003, background): “…independent states are more likely to be 2+ This is akin to the argument that international institutions are epiphenomenal+ Me rsheimer 1994+ See also Mearsheimer 2001+ If agreements have no effect, however, it is not clear why states bother to write them+ Leeds, Long, and Mitchell…”
- Uneven and combined development: the social-relational substratum of ‘the international’? An exchange of letters (2008, background): “A good Marxist treatment of the capitalist geopolitical need no more resemble, say, Mearsheimer’s The tragedy of great power politics (Mearsheimer 2001) than Marx’s analysis of the credit system in Capital, Volume III, Part 5, a neoclassical text on financial markets (I know, I’ve slipped into…”
- Sino-Capitalism: China's Reemergence and the International Political Economy (2012, neutral): “3 mearsheimer 2001, 4.”