Unwanted Identities: A Key Variable in Shame–Anger Links and Gender Differences in Shame

By T. Ferguson, H. L. Eyre, M. Ashbaker. 2000

134 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Language and Linguistics, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6efdc33371eba83a174cea87c16ef2e50c922bc4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Language and Linguistics

1. R. Mills

In Social Psychology

1. L. Brody
2. R. Mills
3. T. Olthof
4. Judith A. Hall

In Sociology and Political Science

1. L. Brody
2. R. Mills
3. Judith A. Hall

Citations in the corpus

• Gender, Emotion, and Socialization (2010, background): “However, gender differences in contempt, guilt, and loneliness have been inconsistent across studies, depending on situational circumstances, the characteristics of the particular samples assessed, and methodological variables, including differences between scenario-based methods and trait measures ”
• Individual Differences in Experiences of and Responses to Guilt and Shame: Examining the Lenses of Gender and Gender Role (2005, unknown): “Researchers who study adult samples often find that women report greater feelings of both shame and guilt than men do when scenariobased measures are used (Evans, 1984; Ferguson & Crowley, 1997; Ferguson, Eyre, & Ashbaker, 2000; Lutwak & Ferrari, 1996).”
• Taking stock of the developmental literature on shame (2005, background): “Similarly in middle childhood, shame-proneness appears to be associated with both internalizing and externalizing problems (Ferguson et al., 2000b; Ferguson, Stegge, Miller, & Olsen, 1999).”
• Gender and emotion in context. (2008, background): “…across studies, depending on situational circumstances, the characteristics of the particular samples assessed, and methodological variables (including differences between scenario-based methods and trait measures of these emotions) (BenettiMcQuoid & Bursik, 2005; Ferguson et al., 2000).”
• Anticipated feelings of guilt and shame as predictors of early adolescents' antisocial and prosocial interpersonal behaviour (2012, background): “According to one such account shame reflects an unwanted identity , that is an appraisal that one is—or appears to be when looked at from a particular perspective—someone one does not want to be, which may result in being held in disesteem by others (Ferguson, 2005 ; Ferguson, Eyre, & Ashbaker, 2”