A framework for selecting a suite of indicators for fisheries management

By J. Rice, Marie-Joëlle Rochet. 2005

470 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6ef2b0c48cb5ac772243342d9c653c956168a505

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

Towards ecosystem-based management: identifying operational food-web indicators for marine ecosystems (2017, background): “It is likely that multiple indicators are needed to track the multiple attributes that comprise food webs and delineation of Good Environmental Status (Rice and Rochet, 2005; Mallory et al., 2010; Large et al., 2015a, b) of which these five candidates are suitable options.”
Seabirds as environmental indicators: the advantages of combining data sets (2007, background): “There is a clear policy-driven need to develop reliable indicators of the ecological state of marine environments to support ecosystem-based management of living resources (Niemi et al. 2004, Rice & Rochet 2005).”
Exploring the effects of fishing on fish assemblages using Abundance Biomass Comparison (ABC) curves (2005, background): “Many indicators have been proposed to capture such effects; all have their own merits and drawbacks based on available scoring criteria (Rice, 2000, 2003; Rochet and Trenkel, 2003; Rice and Rochet, 2005; Shin et al., 2005).”
Modelling an exploited marine fish community with 15 parameters - results from a simple size-based model (2006, unknown): “Average weight in the sea and in the catch decreased consistently with increasing F in the key run, suggesting that these metrics had several properties of good state indicators ( Rice and Rochet, 2005 ).”
Indicators to support an ecosystem approach to fisheries (2005, background): “ Rice and Rochet (2005) proposed a detailed process for indicator selection that could be considered as an elaboration of step 4 in Table 2. Their work was predicated on the recognition that each indicator has monitoring, evaluation and reporting costs, and that a few indicators selected according ”
Open-water integrated multi-trophic aquaculture: environmental biomitigation and economic diversification of fed aquaculture by extractive aquaculture (2012, background): “…are yet to be developed and their practicality evaluated before they become useful in selecting a suite of indicators, acceptable to technical experts and advisors, the aquaculture sector, decision makers and regulatory agency managers, and the general public (Rice & Rochet 2005; Ward et al. 2011).”
Lessons learned from developing integrated ecosystem assessments to inform marine ecosystem-based management in the USA (2014, background): “The development of a performance evaluation system is basic to good management of businesses, environmental issues, human health, and more (Otley, 1999; Link, 2005; Rice and Rochet, 2005; Manski, 2013).”
Bridging the Divide Between Fisheries and Marine Conservation Science (2011, background): “…of effort and the discovery of several thousand potential metrics (rice 2003), there has been a stark realization that indicators alone do not constitute an ecosystem approach. indicators have to be “fit-for-purpose” and need to be selected to report on ecological objectives (rice and rochet 2005).”