The role of habitat connectivity and landscape geometry in experimental zooplankton metacommunities
By A. E. Forbes, Jonathan M. Chase. 2002
142 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Environmental Chemistry, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6eef4df101f867bd5c4d026ba0b9d83f23d819c7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Environmental Chemistry
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Neutrality, niches, and determinants of plankton metacommunity structure across boreal wetland ponds (2007, background): “…of ponds (Cottenie & De Meester, 2003; Cottenie et al., 2003; Louette & De Meester, 2005) and in studies examining the roles of connectivity and the dispersal capacity of organisms per se (Brendonck, De Meester & Riddock, 2000; Shurin, 2000; Forbes & Chase, 2002; Cottenie & De Meester, 2004).”
- Connectivity, scale‐dependence, and the productivity–diversity relationship (2004, background): “Empirical surveys (Harrison & Quinn 1989; Harrison 1997, 1999; Chase 2003a) and experiments ( Forbes & Chase 2002; Kneitel & Miller 2003) support this relationship in a variety of ecosystems.”
- Contrasts between habitat generalists and specialists: an empirical extension to the basic metacommunity framework. (2009, background): “Other metacommunity studies have examined the role of connectivity and dispersal between patches (Gonzalez et al. 1998, Forbes and Chase 2002, Gonzalez and Chaneton 2002), the effects of dispersal and predation at local and metacommunity scales (Kneitel and Miller 2003, Cadotte 2006), or used…”
- Integrating environmental and spatial processes in ecological community dynamics. (2005, background): “Although experiments have illustrated several aspects of metacommunities (Gonzalez et al. 1998; Holyoak 2000; Forbes & Chase 2002), comprehensive tests with observational data are limited in information used and extent of the tests.”
- Control of stream insect assemblages: roles of spatial configuration and local environmental factors (2008, background): “…in a metacommunity context, has received much theoretical interest recently ( Mouquet & Loreau, 2003; Leibold et al. , 2004 ), and some studies have been conducted in either experimental ( Forbes & Chase, 2002; Kneitel & Miller, 2003 ) or field systems ( Cottenie et al. , 2003; Urban, 2004 ).”
- Metacommunity diversity depends on connectivity and patch arrangement in heterogeneous habitat networks (2011, background): “Both habitat heterogeneity and moderate rates of dispersal among local patches is known to increase species richness (Forbes and Chase 2002, Mouquet and Loreau 2003, Davies et al. 2009), however, most studies cite heterogeneity in resources, rather than heterogeneity in resource availability.”
- A comparison of statistical approaches to analyzing community convergence between natural and constructed oyster reefs (2006, methodology): “AlthoughMANOVA has been used extensively to analyze differences in community compositions (e.g., Menge et al., 1997; Hillebrand et al., 2000; Navarrete et al., 2000; Forbes and Chase, 2002; Micheli et al., 2002; Hoeinghaus et al., 2003; Allison, 2004), the approach is controversial (Legendre and And”
- The role of forest structure, fragment size and corridors in maintaining small mammal abundance and diversity in an Atlantic forest landscape (2005, background): “Nonetheless, the decrease in beta diversity with increasing rates of movement of potential dispersal vectors (increasing rates of transfer) has already been shown in an experiment with artificial zooplankton meta-communities (Forbes and Chase, 2002).”