“Planning”, “siting” and the local acceptance of wind power: Some lessons from the French case
By Alain Nadaï. 2007
188 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6ed6e6e2b27afab330ffc3127b0e2af241e2f85a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
In Sociology and Political Science
- Andrea Tabi
- Dragan Pamucar
- Max Munday
- R. Cowell
- Ljubomir Gigović
- G. Bristow
- Rolf Wüstenhagen
- Alister Forman
Citations in the corpus
- Location Selection for Wind Farms Using GIS Multi-Criteria Hybrid Model: An Approach Based on Fuzzy and Rough Numbers (2017, background): “According to Directive 2009/28/EZ [1] and the Decision of the Ministerial Council of the Energy Community [2] a binding target was determined that by 2020, renewable energy would make up 27% of the gross share of energy consumption in the Republic of Serbia.”
- Keep it local and fish-friendly: Social acceptance of hydropower projects in Switzerland (2017, background): “A key driver of perceived procedural justice, and hence potentially social acceptance, is participatory planning and decision-making [32,35,43,44,66].”
- Acceptance, acceptability and environmental justice: the role of community benefits in wind energy development (2011, background): “Such extrapolation needs to be carefully done, as the nature of such benefit streams reflect wider institutional characteristics of renewable energy provision in those countries: thus in Denmark and parts of Germany, ‘community benefits’ arise mainly from cooperative and farmer ownership of turbines”
- The Price of Policy Risk - Empirical Insights from Choice Experiments with European Photovoltaic Project Developers (2012, unknown): “…the ideal choice of policy type include a series of so-called non-economic barriers to renewable energy implementation (OECD/IEA, 2008), such as social acceptance (Toke et al., 2008; Wüstenhagen et al., 2007), planning restrictions (Nadaï, 2007) or connection charges (Butler and Neuhoff, 2008).”