Directional heterogeneity in WTP models for environmental valuation

150 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies (2017, background): “Observable attributes frequently associated with systematic variation in utility parameters include demographic attributes such as income and education, along with spatial (or locational) attributes such as distance to affected areas or residence in a particular region (e.g., Sutherland andWalsh 198”
Valuing biodiversity enhancement in New Zealand's planted forests: Socioeconomic and spatial determinants of willingness-to-pay (2014, background): “…previous studies separately identified the socioeconomic and spatial (distance) determinants of WTP (e.g., Campbell, 2007 – socioeconomic effects; Schaafsma et al., 2012 – socio-demographic characteristics and directional distance effects), this study identified the effects of both groups of…”
Assessing water ecosystem services for water resource management (2016, background): “…distance determines the boundaries of the geographical area, or socalled economic jurisdiction, over which the individual WTPvalues can be aggregated over the population of beneficiaries to calculate the total economic value of a proposed scenario of environmental change (Schaafsma et al., 2012).”