Intelligibility studies: a consideration of empirical and ideological issues
By Joanne Rajadurai. 2007
105 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6e67ec03b7513db756f52787880c5a883e13e41a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- T. Isaacs
- Okim Kang
- Donald Rubin
- Lucy Pickering
- Kazuya Saito
- P. Trofimovich
- Dustin Crowther
- John M. Levis
In Language and Linguistics
- Okim Kang
- T. Isaacs
- Donald Rubin
- Lucy Pickering
- Kazuya Saito
- P. Trofimovich
- John M. Levis
- Dustin Crowther
Citations in the corpus
- Towards Defining a Valid Assessment Criterion of Pronunciation Proficiency in Non-Native English-Speaking Graduate Students (2008, background): “Building on Smith and Nelson’s (1985) argument that intelligibility is interactional rather than speaker-or hearer-based, 7 Rajadurai (2007) argues that intelligibility is co-constructed – a negotiated process between the speaker and listener that is both dynamic and firmly embedded in its…”
- Suprasegmental Measures of Accentedness and Judgments of Language Learner Proficiency in Oral English (2010, background): “In fact, rater judgments of nonnativespeaker (NNS) oral proficiency may be affected by factors as diverse as familiarity with particular accents (Bent & Bradlow, 2003; Derwing & Munro, 2005; Rajadurai, 2007), listeners’ attitudes to speakers’ cultural group (Lippi-Green, 1997; Rubin, 1992; Rubin & S”