The Mechanisms and Outcomes of Evaluation Influence

By M. Mark, G. Henry. 2004

302 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Management Science and Operations Research, Public Administration

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6e61d20a5f37f3fd8b2470a711792e9c4aa6ac26

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

1. Peter Slattery
2. Frans Leeuw
3. P. Bragge
4. Alexander K. Saeri
5. Falk Daviter
6. B. Astbury

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Frans Leeuw
2. J. King
3. Falk Daviter
4. B. Astbury

In Public Administration

1. J. King
2. Falk Daviter

Citations in the corpus

• Research on Evaluation Use (2009, background): “Mark and Henry (Henry & Mark, 2003a, 2003b; Mark & Henry, 2004; Mark, Henry, & Julnes, 1999) have also pushed for broadening the way evaluators conceptualize the consequences of their work.”
• Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews (2020, background): “For example, Mark and Henry [50] examine and link three levels of analysis (individual, interpersonal and collective) to four categories of change (general influence, cognitive and affective, motivational, and behavioural).”
• Unpacking Black Boxes: Mechanisms and Theory Building in Evaluation (2010, background): “For example, Mark and Henry (2004) identify how evaluation use, or more precisely evaluation influence, is brought about through the interaction of theory of evaluation influence has the potential to open up new areas of inquiry by elucidating how and why evaluation works to bring about desired…”
• Framing the Capacity to Do and Use Evaluation (2014, background): “Capacity to use evaluation is a construct that reflects the nature of and extent to which evaluation use and influence occurs within the organization (e.g., Cousins et al., 2004; Mark & Henry, 2004; Shulha & Cousins, 1997).”
• The political use of knowledge in the policy process (2015, background): “For the most part, even more recent theoretical discussions of knowledge utilization conflate conceptual and enlightenment use (e.g., Newman and Head 2015: 388; Mark and Henry 2004: 36), and they overlook that conceptual knowledge can have both substantive and political effects on policy.”